XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone   
   From: jollyroger@pobox.com   
      
   On 2024-07-26, Andrew  wrote:   
   > Jolly Roger wrote on 25 Jul 2024 21:12:36 GMT :   
   >   
   >>> The cite Chris listed said NOTHING whatsoever about the conviction   
   >>> rate.   
   >>   
   >> It certainly shows the conviction rate is higher than your claimed   
   >> "absolute zero". So it seems it was you who lied first. I realize you   
   >> want us to ignore this, but your focus on who lied demands we   
   >> recognize it.   
   >   
   > zealots lack a normal IQ   
      
   Straight to the insults.   
      
   > You both fabricated imaginary convictions   
      
   Actually, both Chris and I provided actual documentation of actual   
   convictions.   
      
   > You lied.   
      
   No, you're projecting.   
      
   > Just showing convictions is completely meaningless to this point.   
      
   No, it's entirely meaningful and disputes your bogus claim that there   
   have been "absolutely zero" convictions.   
      
   We're done here.   
      
   --   
   E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.   
   I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.   
      
   JR   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)