XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2024-07-29 04:23, Andrew wrote:   
   > Chris wrote on Mon, 29 Jul 2024 06:50:53 -0000 (UTC) :   
   >   
   >>> You not comprehending the difference between zero percent of Apple reports   
   >>> versus zero total convictions is how I know you zealots own subnormal IQs.   
   >>   
   >> Not at all. My position hasn't changed. You, however, have had about three   
   >> different positions on this thread and keep getting confused which one   
   >> you're arguing for. lol.   
   >   
   > Au contraire   
   >   
   > Because I only think logically, my rather sensible position has never   
   > changed, Chris, and the fact you "think" it has changed is simply that you   
   > don't know the difference between the percentage of convictions based on   
   > the number of reports, and the total number of convictions.   
   >   
   > When you figure out that those two things are different, then (and only   
   > then) will you realize I've maintained the same position throughout.   
   >   
   > Specifically....   
   >   
   > a. If the Apple reporting rate is low, and yet if their conviction   
   >     rate is high (based on the number of reports), then they are NOT   
   >     underreporting images.   
      
   Apple's reporting rate is ZERO, because they're not doing scanning of   
   images of any kind.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)