XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone   
   From: jollyroger@pobox.com   
      
   On 2024-07-29, Alan  wrote:   
   > On 2024-07-29 04:23, Andrew wrote:   
   >> Chris wrote on Mon, 29 Jul 2024 06:50:53 -0000 (UTC) :   
   >>   
   >>>> You not comprehending the difference between zero percent of Apple reports   
   >>>> versus zero total convictions is how I know you zealots own subnormal IQs.   
   >>>   
   >>> Not at all. My position hasn't changed. You, however, have had about three   
   >>> different positions on this thread and keep getting confused which one   
   >>> you're arguing for. lol.   
   >>   
   >> Au contraire   
   >>   
   >> Because I only think logically, my rather sensible position has never   
   >> changed, Chris, and the fact you "think" it has changed is simply that you   
   >> don't know the difference between the percentage of convictions based on   
   >> the number of reports, and the total number of convictions.   
   >>   
   >> When you figure out that those two things are different, then (and only   
   >> then) will you realize I've maintained the same position throughout.   
   >>   
   >> Specifically....   
   >>   
   >> a. If the Apple reporting rate is low, and yet if their conviction   
   >>     rate is high (based on the number of reports), then they are NOT   
   >>     underreporting images.   
   >   
   > Apple's reporting rate is ZERO, because they're not doing scanning of   
   > images of any kind.   
      
   It's zero for *photos*, but not for *email*:   
      
      
      
   --   
   E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.   
   I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.   
      
   JR   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)