Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.privacy    |    Discussing privacy, laws, tinfoil hats    |    112,125 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 110,737 of 112,125    |
|    Your Name to All    |
|    Re: Whom can you trust with your data? (    |
|    25 Sep 24 08:29:57    |
      XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.pri       acy.anon-server       XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy       From: YourName@YourISP.com              On 2024-09-24 15:45:31 +0000, Newyana2 said:       > On 9/24/2024 9:13 AM, -hh wrote:       >       >>> "Standard data protection is the default setting for your account.       >>> Your iCloud data is encrypted, the encryption keys are secured in       >>> Apple data centers so we can help you with data recovery, and       >>> only certain data is end-to-end encrypted."       >>>       >>> Translation: Apple have your data.       >>>       >>> https://support.apple.com/en-us/102651       >>       >>       >> Except that it wasn't in contention that Apple has one's data.       >>       >       > Actually this started with me using the example of online iPhone       > backup as an example of how people trust Apple and don't care       > about their privacy. Alan then said the data is encrypted. This       > blurb and link are simply to show that Apple does, indeed, have       > access to the data by default.       >       >> What was in contention was your claim that Apple is like Google, in       >> claiming unlimited legal rights to it (e.g. "we can do whatever we       >> damn well please with your data").       >>       >       > They don't need to claim. It's already legal precendent. There have       > been cases where courts demanded all email from a gmail customer,       > for example. But they don't demand it from the person. They demand       > it from Google. For you to put your files on their server gives them a       > degree of legal co-ownership. It's similar with Microsoft's online       > data storage or Adobe's Photoshop rental. You data is no longer       > completely yours once you let them hold it.              And that's no different to decades ago when you filled out a form and       gave it to your insurance porvider, bank, doctor, etc., etc.              If you're one of the tin-foil hat wearing loonies, then the only way to       get real "privacy" is to live alone and completely self-sufficient in a       cave in the ass-end of nowhere, hundreds of miles from the nearest       other person, and not use any public utilities or services.                                   > Of course, Google claims the right to rifle through your email.       > Interestingly, attempts by non-gmailers to sue them over that have       > failed. Google's basic argument is, "Hey, everyone knows we're sleazeballs.       > Anyone writing an email to a gmail account can reasonably be expected       > to know that we're going to treat it as our property." And Google won!       > I suppose it comes down to the idea that "possession is 9/10ths of       > ownership". It's also convenient for governments. Law enforcement demands       > that these companies hand over whatever they want. The companies       > pretend to resist. But in the end, only the customer has an interest       > in their own rights.       >       >> Now the above language doesn't say that for Apple so please try again       >> to substantiate your assertion that Apple is free to do whatever they       >> want.       >>       >       > :) I'm not going to substantiate anything. You're clearly a       > starry eyed AppleSeed who will argue all day, despite any       > amount of evidence. For people who actually want to know       > the facts, there's plenty of info online, starting with the fine       > by the French gov't last year because Apple was spying on       > iPhone users without permission, for the purpose of targetted       > ads... But of course, you didn't look that one up. If I were       > using Apple devices, trusting their intentions, and someone       > told me they'd been caught spying, I'd want to know the facts.       >       > It's not my intention to argue with you or try to convert you. I       > only post these things because if it were me, I'd want people       > to tell me. And this is a public forum where people might come       > across this info. And some people are not ostriches.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca