XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.pri   
   acy.anon-server   
   XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2024-09-26 04:53, Newyana2 wrote:   
   > On 9/26/2024 5:33 AM, Chris wrote:   
   >   
   >>>    They don't need to claim. It's already legal precendent.   
   >>   
   >> Only in the US. Fortunately in Europe we have data privacy laws that   
   >> actually mean something.   
   >   
   >    Indeed. Civilized law serving the public is not on the horizon   
   > in our plutocratic US system.   
   >   
   >>> starting with the fine   
   >>> by the French gov't last year because Apple was spying on   
   >>> iPhone users without permission, for the purpose of targetted   
   >>> ads...   
   >>   
   >> That was technical error about informing users appropriately; not that   
   >> they   
   >> were caught spying. It was also historical and had already been   
   >> corrected.   
   >>   
   >    "for illegally harvesting iPhone owners’ data for targeted ads without   
   > proper consent."   
      
   So that means your claim that Apple's terms and conditions ALLOW them to   
   use your data is false...   
      
   ...right?   
      
   >   
   >    Collecting data from iPhones is spyware. Consent implies that   
   > people had a choice and could have said no....   
      
   They could have said no.   
      
   The default setting was set to allow collection accidentally.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)