XPost: rec.food.cooking, wi.general, alt.california   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.idiots   
   From: lds@example.ut   
      
   On 10/5/2024 6:47 PM, Hank Rogers wrote:   
   > Mittens Romney wrote:   
   >>   
   >> https://redstate.com/jenvanlaar/2024/10/05/doug-emhoffs-spoke   
   person-denies-slapping-story-silent-on-hush-money-accusation-n2180161   
   >>   
   >> After a second negative Daily Mail report about Second Gentleman Doug   
   >> Emhoff's behavior with women, Emhoff's spokesperson issued a brief   
   >> statement to Semafor denying one allegation and ignoring another set   
   >> of allegations.   
   >>   
   >> As RedState covered, Emhoff is accused of slapping an ex-girlfriend   
   >> across the face so hard that she spun around. Emhoff's supposed reason   
   >> for the assault was his belief that the woman, who the Daily Mail   
   >> referred to as Jane, was flirting with a valet as the two left a party   
   >> during the Cannes Film Festival in France in 2012. Of course, the   
   >> liberal legacy media ignored the story, and the next day Semafor   
   >> published a tidbit in their morning newsletter headlined, "Second   
   >> gentleman becomes a target," making Emhoff the victim, of course:   
   >>   
   >> Half of the political world focused Wednesday on a Daily Mail report   
   >> that second gentleman Doug Emhoff “forcefully slapped ex-girlfriend   
   >> for flirting with another man” at Cannes in 2012. Others (including   
   >> Semafor) haven’t matched the reporting, and as of Wednesday evening   
   >> the incident didn’t appear in The New York Times or top outlets. But   
   >> the allegations are a dominant narrative in conservative media: Megyn   
   >> Kelly’s coverage had more than 150,000 views on YouTube, while Trump   
   >> aide Stephen Miller demanded answers.   
   >>   
   >> In a statement to Semafor, a spokesperson for Emhoff said “this   
   >> report is untrue,” and that “any suggestion that he would or has   
   >> ever hit a woman is false.” This is a new campaign front: Emhoff has   
   >> been a key Harris’ advocate, cast as a relatable, enlightened   
   >> “wife guy” and father who “discussed the feminism of Pearl   
   >> Jam.” Now he’s a target. A New York Post columnist wrote that   
   if   
   >> “Emhoff is the new face of masculinity, the Dems are up a   
   creek.”   
   >>   
   >> The spokesperson didn't address which aspects of the report are untrue   
   >> - the Daily Mail published photos of Emhoff and the woman together and   
   >> their travel itinerary, and a YouTube video from the party's red   
   >> carpet showed Emhoff and a brunette woman attending the event together.   
   >>   
   >> Jane also told Daily Mail that Emhoff admitted to her that he'd   
   >> impregnated the kids' teacher (who also worked for the Emhoff family   
   >> as a nanny), and that the teacher/nanny accused Emhoff of causing a   
   >> miscarriage during an "aggressive" altercation. Eventually, Emhoff   
   >> told Jane, he "settled" with the nanny for approximately $80,000 and   
   >> had her sign a non-disclosure agreement (NDA).   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Sources not connected with Jane told RedState in August that there was   
   >> a domestic violence incident between Emhoff and the nanny that   
   >> resulted in the LAPD being dispatched to the home where the nanny   
   >> lived. The Daily Mail report included an LAPD report showing a call   
   >> for service for an "unknown disturbance" to the nanny's home in June,   
   >> 2009, which corresponds with the time frame of the pregnancy.   
   >>   
   >> Emhoff's spokesperson didn't address the new information about the   
   >> nanny's pregnancy specifically. Wonder why?   
   >>   
   >>   
   >   
   > Hey, it's all ok as long as he grabbed her pussy before he slapped her   
   > jaws. Then it's an official act, not a felony.   
   >   
   >   
      
   Very typical Demotarded misogynistic rationalization.   
      
   What is it like being amoral?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)