Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.privacy    |    Discussing privacy, laws, tinfoil hats    |    112,125 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 110,855 of 112,125    |
|    Alan to Andrew    |
|    Re: RCS is not more private and secure t    |
|    18 Dec 24 19:22:28    |
      XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone       From: nuh-uh@nope.com              On 2024-12-18 18:56, Andrew wrote:       > Carlos E.R. wrote on Wed, 18 Dec 2024 21:18:26 +0100 :       >       >>> The FBI doesn't take sides so they don't mention Apple is the problem.       >>> But anyone with half a brain is well aware that Apple is the problem.       >>       >> It is, however, reasonable for a company to say that they will only       >> implement the approved standard. However, I don't know for what       >> reasons, the standard will not be expanded for some reason I don't       >> know, either temporarily or permanently. That company should push hard       >> for the standard to expand. Maybe this can not be. And say clearly       >> when the standard is expected to be ready. IF.       >>       >> In that case, said company should implement instead the existing       >> proprietary method, which perhaps, I do not know, has been offered       >> free of charge. Even as a temporary measure while the standard is       >> developed, for the benefit of all users.       >       > We all know from Apple's history that the last thing Apple wants is       > interoperability with other platforms (the proof is rampant everywhere).              And yet you won't provide it.              Weird.              >       > We also all know Apple is being forced to care about the customer by EU       > laws, where we all know Apple implements as little as it can get away with.       >       > In addition, we all know the Epic deposition showcased Apple executives'       > emails, which said that the messaging platform is one of the most critical       > components of the walled garden that Apple does NOT want interoperable.                            >       > With all that in mind, we also all know Apple (and Google) are on the same       > standards committee - where - we don't really know what goes on behind       > those closed doors.       > Is Apple stalling?       > I don't know.       And yet you'll claim they are.              Weird.              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca