home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.privacy      Discussing privacy, laws, tinfoil hats      112,125 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 110,855 of 112,125   
   Alan to Andrew   
   Re: RCS is not more private and secure t   
   18 Dec 24 19:22:28   
   
   XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2024-12-18 18:56, Andrew wrote:   
   > Carlos E.R. wrote on Wed, 18 Dec 2024 21:18:26 +0100 :   
   >   
   >>> The FBI doesn't take sides so they don't mention Apple is the problem.   
   >>> But anyone with half a brain is well aware that Apple is the problem.   
   >>   
   >> It is, however, reasonable for a company to say that they will only   
   >> implement the approved standard. However, I don't know for what   
   >> reasons, the standard will not be expanded for some reason I don't   
   >> know, either temporarily or permanently. That company should push hard   
   >> for the standard to expand. Maybe this can not be. And say clearly   
   >> when the standard is expected to be ready. IF.   
   >>   
   >> In that case, said company should implement instead the existing   
   >> proprietary method, which perhaps, I do not know, has been offered   
   >> free of charge. Even as a temporary measure while the standard is   
   >> developed, for the benefit of all users.   
   >   
   > We all know from Apple's history that the last thing Apple wants is   
   > interoperability with other platforms (the proof is rampant everywhere).   
      
   And yet you won't provide it.   
      
   Weird.   
      
   >   
   > We also all know Apple is being forced to care about the customer by EU   
   > laws, where we all know Apple implements as little as it can get away with.   
   >   
   > In addition, we all know the Epic deposition showcased Apple executives'   
   > emails, which said that the messaging platform is one of the most critical   
   > components of the walled garden that Apple does NOT want interoperable.   
      
      
      
   >   
   > With all that in mind, we also all know Apple (and Google) are on the same   
   > standards committee - where - we don't really know what goes on behind   
   > those closed doors.   
   > Is Apple stalling?   
   > I don't know.   
   And yet you'll claim they are.   
      
   Weird.   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca