tk4facb76jgl3sc3nda3sz4fqd.onion> 826ec17d   
   XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, sci.crypt   
   From: 00000@zero.null   
      
   Nomen Nescio wrote:   
   > Are you just trying to spread FUD in order to support half-baked   
   > experimental toys, or are there any clear indications that conventional   
   > encryption is broken, all remailers are compromized and Chaum mixes are   
   > a flawed concept?  So which proven alternatives would you recommend?   
   >   
      
   I have run a remailer out of my own pocket for many years, with my own funds.   
   I don’t think it’s the time to explain to YOU how much I care about APA-S,   
   how much this is not a FUD post, how much i don't depend on shit tools like   
   telegram or whatsapp    
   or what I want to propose as an alternative, neither.   
      
   I have seen the evolution of APA-S and if I say this is because if in the past   
   this approach worked, now , with a lot of humility I think it’s no longer   
   the case.   
      
   As I see it you try to throw gasoline on a fire that does not exist, it’s   
   only in your head.   
      
   Get a life   
      
   Gabx   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)