XPost: alt.comp.freeware
From: V@nguard.LH
wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 17:18:45 -0500, VanguardLH wrote:
>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Looks
>>like you think the only definition of a virtual disk is one that conumes
>>RAM to provide fast but temporary storage. So far, it doesn't appear
>>you have a clue how it worked.
>
> Correct. I don't have a clue how it works. As I said more than once, I
> LUV Time Freeze because the average user doesn't have to have a clue how
> it woks. I just WORKS! It has saved my C: numerous times from crap I
> deliberately/accidentally downloaded.
>
> You tekkie boys just LUV complicate shit. You demean simplicity. It
> seems to piss you tekkie boys off when the average ignorant user can
> match with SIMPLE what you tekkies insist SHOULD be COMPLICATED - like
> the complicated shit you luv to post about with your infamous multi
> hundred word posts.
>
> Jeesh! Gimme a break!
When someone says how something works, and then you deny that
explanation but don't have a clue of it works, makes you look a fool.
Don't whine about an explanation claiming it is in error.
You made the outright denial of "There is no virtual disk required for
Time Freeze" yet you don't know. You posted to Usenet which is a public
communication venue, yet you then reacted like I was only talking to
you. Usenet is not e-mail or chat or texts. My reply, like yours, was
addressed to the entire community.
You don't how it works, and you don't want to know, yet you advertise
the product in public while making disclaimers on how it works when you
don't know. Just say "Okay, if you say so, but I'm not into the
details. Thanks anyway." In Usenet, there is no way to reply without
replying, and a wholly separate thread would disconnect from your post.
--- SoupGate-DOS v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
