XPost: alt.comp.freeware   
   From: V@nguard.LH   
      
    wrote:   
      
   > On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 18:03:26 -0500, VanguardLH  wrote:   
   >   
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >   
   >>   
   >>When someone says how something works, and then you deny that   
   >>explanation but don't have a clue of it works, makes you look a fool.   
   >>Don't whine about an explanation claiming it is in error.   
   >   
   > Now you're lying to win an argument.  I never denied any explanation   
   > about how a VM works.  I've said that over and over.   
      
   I said Timewiz Time Freeze uses a virtual disk scheme to intercept all   
   disk writes when active.  What did you say?   
      
   "All that babel about other virtual drives, etc., has nothing to do with   
   Time Freeze."   
      
   Well, that means you KNOW Time Freeze does not use virtual drives to   
   intercept disk writes.  To Allan you said:   
      
   "There is no virtual disk required for Time Freeze."   
      
   Again you claim to KNOW Time Freeze does not use virtual drives.  Then   
   you say you don't know.  Stop trying to recant what you said.  You're   
   not fooling anyone here.   
      
   Sorry you feel I attacked you.  That wasn't my intention.  I described   
   how the product works, and it is not the robust anti-malware solution   
   you profess.  It's to protect against user error, not against malware.   
   You run "without having any AV or other "Security" program installed"   
   which means even during a virtual session that you can get infected, and   
   hurt others, or your docs stored in other volumes.  Time Freeze is NOT   
   about thwarting malware as you implied.   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)