Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.privacy    |    Discussing privacy, laws, tinfoil hats    |    112,125 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 111,346 of 112,125    |
|    Gabx to Anonymous    |
|    Re: email Tutorial Create your own and f    |
|    31 May 25 18:23:07    |
      XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, sci.crypt       From: Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]              Anonymous wrote:       > Even in this posting you are lying about OmniMix, as it isn't       > closed source software. It actually offers in a unique way the       > most advanced kind of source code access, as with every version       > there comes a one-click installer of the complete development       > system, which then automatically creates the OmniMix binary from       > its sources ready for a bitwise comparison with the executable       > distributed as a part of the OmniMix system. And, addressing your       > previous rant from a few hours ago, with such transparency offered       > by OmniMix, please don't conceal from us where exactly it is       > crashing and leaking information. We'd appreciate that advice as       > a goodwill gesture. You have to know that we in this group are       > highly interested in pushing things forward.       >       > But stop posting your lies over here and act out your destructive       > obsession somewhere else.              You're right about one thing: OmniMix apparently does offer source access       through a quirky one-click self-recompiling installer. I missed that, and for       the crime of calling it "closed source," I hereby sentence myself to a week of       digital flagellation.        Mea culpa. Now that we've cleared that up, can we please move on from the       drama?              That said, let's not pretend OmniMix is running on some benevolent operating       system handcrafted by privacy monks. It runs on WinZOZ a platform built from       the ground up to harvest user data, enforce DRM, and serve corporate masters.       You can wrap it in all        the transparent wrappers you want, but it's still sitting on top of a       surveillance monolith. As far as i'm concerned i don't use WinZOZ since XP,       for the record.              You accuse me of "disinformation" and "egomania," but you're the one twisting       legitimate criticism into personal offense. Is it that painful to see someone       praise code outside your Microsoft-centric bubble? Privacy is not a brand       war-at least not for me.        For you? I'm starting to wonder.              If you truly believe in pushing things forward, start by dropping the purity       tests and the righteous outrage. I'm happy to correct mistakes, but don't       mistake that for backing down from my principles: freedom of thought,       decentralization, and a healthy        distrust of anything with a EULA longer than a dystopian novel.              So yes #FreeUkraine, #FreeTibet, #FreeGaza, and while you're at it, maybe also       #FreeYourMind.              Cheers,              Gabx              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca