Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.privacy    |    Discussing privacy, laws, tinfoil hats    |    112,125 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 111,557 of 112,125    |
|    Marion to badgolferman    |
|    Re: Google accessed users' mobile device    |
|    05 Sep 25 02:02:34    |
      XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone       From: marion@facts.com              On Thu, 4 Sep 2025 07:54:10 -0400, badgolferman wrote :                     >> So even if someone was using an iPhone and thought they'd opted out of       >> tracking, Google could still collect data through third-party apps that       >> integrated its tools.       >       > Is this an iPhone or Android or both violation of privacy?              Hi badgolferman,              Great question. The problem is Google gives the developers its code.       Those developers use Google's code in both iOS & Android applications.              Hence, unfortunately, it's both platforms as developers integrate Google       APIs such as Google Analytics into both operating systems; but the good       news for iOS is that it's a little less worse on iOS than it is on Android.              The court found that Google continued collecting user data even after       people disabled tracking features like Web & App Activity. This was       possible because many third-party apps (including Uber, Lyft, Amazon,       Instagram & Facebook) have integrated Google services like Firebase and       Google Analytics. These integrations allowed Google to gather user activity       data regardless of the device's operating system.              So even if someone was using an iPhone & thought they'd opted out of       tracking, Google could still collect data through those apps. The key issue       wasn't the phone OS itself. It was the embedded Google services inside the       apps users interacted with.              Google's argument, of course, is that they didn't do it. Facebook did it.       Or Uber did it. And Lyft did it. But the court didn't fall for the ruse.              Google plans on appealing because Google claims that the jury didn't       understand them. Personally, I think the jury understood all too well.              This case is a reminder that privacy controls on your mobile device or       account don't always extend to the services running behind the scenes.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca