XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, sci.crypt   
   From: fritz@spamexpire-202509.rodent.frell.theremailer.net   
      
   Liar Gabx wrote:   
      
   > Fritz Wuehler wrote:   
   >>   
   >>    Don't act the fool.  You argument like a little child, which only   
   >> accepts what it already knows and refuses everything new.   
   >>   
   >>    For every OmniMix version there's a self-extracting repository, which   
   >> for the current version is   
   >>   
   >>    https://danner-net.de/om/OmniMix_IDE_2.8.3_Uno_Setup.exe   
   >>    with its PGP signature at   
   >>    https://danner-net.de/om/OmniMix_IDE_2.8.3_Uno_Setup.exe.asc.   
   >>   
   >>    Select "Don't create a Start Menu folder" and "Portable mode (no   
   >> uninstallation support)" and the files are extracted to the folder of   
   >> your choice without altering your system.   
   >>   
   >>    As described in detail in https://danner-net.de/omom/tutorinstall.htm   
   >>   
   >> | You may be interested in getting an impression of the files to be   
   installed without having to run the setup program. In that case extract its   
   contents for example using the Inno Setup Unpacker:   
   >> |   
   >> | -----------------------------------------------------------   
   --------------------   
   >> | c:\InnoUnpack>innounp.exe -x -d"OmniMix Setup Files" OmniMi   
   _2.1.2_Uno_Setup.exe   
   >> | -----------------------------------------------------------   
   --------------------   
   >>   
   >> you can also use the Inno Setup Unpacker from   
   >> https://sourceforge.net/projects/innounp/ for that purpose.   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> I have not found an official repository called OmniMix with all the source   
   code on sites like GitHub, GitLab, SourceForge or other repositories.   
   >>   
   >>    You have to accept that there are free people, who want to keep full   
   >> control of their work and therefore dislike to hand it over to such data   
   >> collectors.   
   >   
   > I thought we were talking about "opensource" definition and now you tell me   
   about "Christian Danner" human rights?   
   >   
   > You just shot yourself in the foot by pasting the license.   
   >   
   > It literally says the source is for review only, you can't redistribute, you   
   can't modify, and ownership always remains with Danner.   
   >   
   > That's the very definition of proprietary source-available software, not   
   open source.   
   >   
   > So before screaming "liar" and comparing people to Putin or Trump, maybe   
   learn to read the damn license you just quoted.   
   >   
   > Right now you're proving my point, not yours.   
   >   
   > That's not open source, that's proprietary with source peep-rights.   
   >   
   > Congrats, you just proved my argument for me.   
      
     So that's the way you try to wriggle out of your lies?  With further   
   lies?   
      
     You blamed OmniMix for being "closed source software" multiple times   
      
     in MID <20250921.1758483376.192682.2461@m2usenet.local>   
     from Sun, 21 Sep 2025 19:36:16 +0000   
      
   | Before calling others stupid, maybe try providing an actual link to   
   OmniMix's "source code.   
   |   
   | I have not found an official repository called OmniMix with all the source   
   code on sites like GitHub, GitLab, SourceForge or other repositories.   
   |   
   | On the official website there is no indication of OSI-approved licenses such   
   as GPL, MIT, Apache, etc.   
   |   
   | License is a key element in open source.   
   |   
   | Installation with a proprietary EULA/agreement is another typical sign of   
   closed source software.   
      
   | You install your closed, shitty software with one click, accepting licenses   
   that you will never read and will never be aware of, nor what diabolical pact   
   you said you agreed to, and I'm the stupid one.   
      
     in MID <20250920095312.C1E173E76F@mail.tcpreset.net>   
     from Sat, 20 Sep 2025 09:53:12 +0000 (UTC)   
      
   | And seriously, you're gonna defend some closed-source Windows software?   
   Omnimix?   
      
   | So you can keep your shady, closed-source junk. We'll stick with code that   
   doesn't have a secret handshake for the feds.   
      
     and that you're a deliberate liar and not only an ignorant idiot shows   
      
     MID <20250531.182304.eb882b3c@yamn.paranoici.org>   
     from Sat, 31 May 2025 18:23:07 +0000   
      
   | You're right about one thing: OmniMix apparently does offer source access   
   through a quirky one-click self-recompiling installer. I missed that, and for   
   the crime of calling it "closed source," I hereby sentence myself to a week of   
   digital flagellation.    
   Mea culpa. Now that we've cleared that up, can we please move on from the   
   drama?   
      
     where you already had to admit to know about source code availability.   
      
     You're simply a mean asshole who tries to play his guileful game of   
   vilifying a reputable software contributor again and again.  And by   
   doing so you're also pissing on all of us here in a.p.a-s.  That's   
   disgusting!  I think there's no need for mentally ill creatures like you   
   and your buddy Claas in this group.  Face it, you're wrong here.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)