home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.privacy      Discussing privacy, laws, tinfoil hats      112,125 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 111,761 of 112,125   
   Gabx to All   
   Re: M2usenet2.0 is out   
   19 Oct 25 14:16:47   
   
   XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, sci.crypt   
   From: info@tcpreset.invalid   
      
   So this response isn't for the trolls or the blind fanboys.   
   It's for anyone who genuinely wants to understand the technical details.   
      
   Yamn2 Remailer wrote:   
   > As you also post to sci.crypt we have here experts in this field.   
      
   And you are not part of them.   
      
   > First of all, OmniMix isn't closed source software even if you repeat   
   > that lie again and again.  Why do you do that as you know better?  Fact   
   > is that with OmniMix you even get the complete IDE, which with a few   
   > mouse clicks builds the executable program on your computer ready to be   
   > run in a debugger step by step and compared with the file from the   
   > installation package byte by byte.  You're in control of everything!   
      
   "Providing an IDE to compile is not equivalent to 'open source' in the   
   OSI definition.   
   Open source requires:   
      
   - Public source code repository   
   - OSI-approved license (GPL, MIT, BSD, etc.)   
   - Right to modify and redistribute   
      
   If OmniMix meets these criteria, I stand corrected.   
   A link to the public repository would clarify this."   
      
   > Now to your web interface.  There we have the exact oposite.  You   
   > present us source code, but whether that's what processes our data is   
   > beyond our control.  Even if we once or twice download the published   
   > code the next time for whatever reason it may be different and   
   > compromize our identity.  A system for gamblers.   
      
   For maximum security: Self-host your own instance. That's why it's   
   open source.   
      
   > Furthermore, the anonymity of our plain text messages is secured by an   
   > extremely weak real-time Tor connection of usually no more than 3 nodes   
   > while with OmniMix you're allowed to route your data through much longer   
   > Tor circuits and those data aren't plain text but multilayer-encrypted   
   > remailer packets.   
      
   Calling Tor "extremely weak" with "no more than 3 nodes" shows a   
   fundamental misunderstanding of the architecture, for both tor and m2usenet.   
      
   m2usenet routes through THREE Tor hidden services:   
   1. Pluto2 SMTP relay (.onion)   
   2. mail2news gateway (.onion)   
   3. NNTP server (.onion)   
      
   Each hidden service connection uses 3 hops. Total: 9+ hops minimum.   
      
   Calling this "weak" is not a technical argument, it's dismissive rhetoric.   
      
   > And then there still is the unanswered question of a signature based on   
   > a single-use throwaway key, where the user only gets knowledge of the   
   > public key but not the secret key or the passphrase, both only known to   
   > you as the service provider.  That's weird.  It doesn't verify anything.   
   > It just proves that the user is stupid enough to deal with your insecure   
   > web interface.   
      
   - keyPair generated client-side   
   - keyPair.secretKey stays IN BROWSER MEMORY (never transmitted)   
   - Only publicKey + signature sent to server   
   - Server CANNOT access secretKey   
      
   > Equally weird is your statement about Hashcash bits in MID   
   > <1760739178.dcc2021df3109aecc5b428f2d8ff300f@m2usenet.local>:   
   >   
   > | 16bit option is fast.   
   > | But not recommended, thou !   
   >   
   > So you recommend spammers for fairness reasons to select more bits?  No   
   > kidding?   
      
   The difficulty levels serve different purposes:   
      
   - 16 bits: Prevents message flooding   
   - 20 bits (default): Balanced protection (~5-10 seconds per post)   
   - 24 bits: Strong protection (~30-60 seconds per post)   
   - 28 bits: Very strong (~several minutes per post)   
      
   Real spammers use botnets with GPU/ASIC mining, not browser interfaces.   
   A web UI with mandatory proof-of-work is specifically designed to   
   PREVENT automated spam tools.   
      
   > Man!  You're really a droll fellow.   
      
   Gabx   
   --   
   0745 074D FEAA 9CB7 62E9  D89D 3E54 F490 F2CC 5A82   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca