XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, sci.crypt   
   From: noreply@dirge.harmsk.com   
      
   Stefan Claas  wrote:   
   >Yamn Remailer wrote:   
   >> Gabx  wrote:   
   >>   
   >> > So this response isn't for the trolls or the blind fanboys.   
   >> > It's for anyone who genuinely wants to understand the technical details.   
   >> >   
   >> > Yamn2 Remailer wrote:   
   >> > > As you also post to sci.crypt we have here experts in this field.   
   >> >   
   >> > And you are not part of them.   
   >>   
   >> I'm not part of them but I wonder why the experts continued to enhance   
   >> Mixmaster and Yamn remailing after the Tor network started in 2006?   
   >> Stupidity?  Or ample spare time?  I doubt it.   
   >>   
   >   
   >Please explain. What was introcuded IIRC was that Elvis added 4k key   
   >support to Mixmaster and Zax added modern Crypto and anti-tagging to   
   >YAMN.   
      
   Which wouldn't have be done if not worth it considering Tor.  And with   
   such minimal further improvements required it looks like it's an already   
   perfect concept.  It may only lack alternative inter-remailer   
   communication through Tor though that isn't a core remailer task but a   
   simple MTA configuration issue.   
      
   > So what more anonymity you gain with them when already using Tor?   
      
   We already told you that multiple times.   
      
   >   
   >With YAMN's security flaws you can be easily de-anonymized.   
      
   Which security flaws?  You don't think of Internet I/O which anyhow has   
   to be handled by specialized communication software like OmniMix?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)