XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, sci.crypt   
   From: noreply@dirge.harmsk.com   
      
   Radio Eriwan  wrote:   
   >Another untrustworthy OmniMix User wrote:   
   >> Radio Eriwan  wrote:   
   >> > An untrustworthy OmniMix user wrote:   
   >> > > Anonymous User  wrote:   
   >> > > > Gabx  wrote:   
   >> > >   
   >> > > > > You're claiming longer circuits are safer.   
   >> > > > > I'm asking for proof.   
   >> > > > > You've provided none.   
   >> > > > > Just "no proof" responses while ignoring established research.   
   >> > > >   
   >> > > > I provided evidence, you contributed nothing.   
   >> > >   
   >> > > I understand Gabx's confusion.  OmniMix uses Tor only to deliver   
   >> > > packets to the remailer network, a task of minor importance   
   >> > > concerning anonymity, and you have the choice of creating longer   
   >> > > circuits or not.   
   >> >   
   >> > A task of minor importance? You would shit your pants if you didn't   
   >> > use Tor with OmniMix because you don't trust the remailer operators,   
   >> > as they can be pressured and the remailer traffic of these public   
   >> > mini networks can be completely monitored.   
   >>   
   >> Learn about Type II Remailer networks.  For an external adversary   
   >> there's nothing to win.   
   >>   
   >   
   >Utterly nonsense! And you know that very well!   
      
   That's something only Claas knows as he doesn't share his wisdoms.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)