XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, sci.crypt   
   From: info@tcpreset.invalid   
      
   Radio Eriwan wrote:   
   > In article <20251028.172359.1e28b5b0@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>Fritz   
   Wuehler wrote:   
   >> Gabx  wrote:   
   >>> Anonymous User wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> Take a few basic English lessons, preppy.  You idiot always stick out.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Yours contribution to this group is zero.   
   >>> You and yuor mates do nothing here.   
   >>> Just spreading ignorance and insults.   
   >>> We're here to discuss privacy and anonymous servers.   
   >>> Whether you use Omnimix, QS, or none of the above doesn't matter.   
   >>> In APA-S we're open to dialogue.   
   >>>   
   >>> If I work hard and then proudly publish my links to the seven worlds, it's   
   not ego that.   
   >>>   
   >>> I give free services and i'm an egoist ?   
   >>>   
   >>> It's just obvious you've never worked or fought to achieve results in your   
   life.   
   >>>   
   >>> This attitude won't get you anywhere.   
   >>>   
   >>> Trying to denigrate me or Stef in this NG is a leap into the unknown.   
   >>>   
   >>> I don't know where your verbal slur comes from, but I don't specialize in   
   sociology, psychology, or psychiatry.   
   >>> It's certainly not our area of ??expertise, you know?   
   >>>   
   >>> With great humility we have always helped those who asked for help, we   
   realize that a command line can't be easy at first, but it remains just a   
   command line, you understand?   
   >>> If you don't remember commands, you write them down and than you will   
   remember, you know?   
   >>>   
   >>> It's just IT man, information technology and this is APA-S,   
   >>> ALT.PRIVACY.ANON-SERVER   
   >>>   
   >>> You conform or get the hell out of here,   
   >>> all of you!   
   >>>   
   >>> Gabx   
   >>   
   >> So we aren't allowed to express our concerns about the risks of active web   
   contents compromizing our anonymity?   
   >> And we aren't allowed to point to the flaws of the real-time Tor network   
   compared with anonymous remailing?   
   >> And we aren't allowed to discuss the disadvantages of anonymous data   
   packets in transmission indicating net message size?   
   >> And we aren't allowed to name a type 1 remailing scheme with no more than a   
   single chain what it is, broken?   
   >> And we aren't allowed to refuse services offered by companies aiming at   
   making profits?   
   >>   
   >> And if we nevertheless express our concerns we're confronted with repeating   
   quibbles and lies and your constant denigration of the confidable work of   
   others, which exposes your hybris and is inconsistent with the humility you   
   claim for yourself.   
   >>   
   >> No, I for my part neither conform with you nor do I leave apa-s.  This   
   group is too important to cave in and yield the floor to self-obsessed snake   
   oil peddlers like you and Claas, who poison any honest discussion.   
   >>   
      
   +1   
      
   > Fine, you deliberately don't want to understand that, but then at least shut   
   up.   
   >   
      
   United we stand ;)   
      
   --   
   0745 074D FEAA 9CB7 62E9  D89D 3E54 F490 F2CC 5A82   
   https://yamn.virebent.art   
   https://news.tcpreset.net   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)