86091918   
   XPost: alt.anonymous, alt.privacy.anon-server   
   From: nobody@yamn.paranoici.org   
      
   >> What if there was a program that posted bogus but realistic looking   
   >> messages to AAM.   
   >>   
   >> Kindly give your pros and cons on the idea.   
   >>   
      
   > It's already being done. In fact, I would estimate that approx.   
   > 80% of AAM content is dummy messages. I know because I send   
   > them. Hourly.   
      
     The first answer was mine "Bad.  Unnecessary clutter.".  I was   
   thinking it was referring to the alt.privacy.anon-server news group.   
   It is a good thing to send dummy messages to AAM.  The reason is that   
   if you are communicating with someone(s) using AAM, you need to   
   randomly post good dummy messages.  If you don't, then every message   
   you post will be a legitimate message and can be easily tracked by evil   
   NSA, etc.  If they are sitting on your IP and gathering your messages,   
   they will have to try to decrypt all of them to see which one is valid.   
    It is only right to put it to those corrupt, Constitution tramplers   
   who are trying to destroy you.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)