From: user6340@newsgrouper.org.invalid
DocUFO posted:
> On 12/9/2025 5:37 PM, Steven Douglas wrote:
> > DocUFO posted:
> >> On 12/9/2025 2:52 PM, Steven Douglas wrote:
> >>> DocUFO posted:
> >>>>
> >>>> I asked AI CoPilot:
> >>>>
> >>>> What are the social, legal implications of the new DOJ agenda to
> >>>> persecute critics of Christianity and capitalism?
> >>>
> >>> I really enjoy the way you ask the thing such leading
> >>> questions. Just so you know, Doc, the agenda to which
> >>> you refer will not take away your right to come on
> >>> this group and be critical of religion. That's not
> >>> what the new agenda is about. It's about undoing some
> >>> of the horrific restrictions on religious people that
> >>> the corrupt Biden administration put into effect.
> >>>
> >>> Do you have any idea the number of churches that have
> >>> been attacked by godless leftists in recent years?
> >>> And with all of that, the corrupt Democrats who ran
> >>> the corrupt Biden administration instituted a policy
> >>> in which they declared that "radical-traditionalist"
> >>> Catholics were a domestic terrorism threat. People
> >>> who believe in God were considered the enemy by our
> >>> corrupt government (under the corrupt Democrats who
> >>> controlled it).
> >>>
> >>> Thank God Trump was reelected in 2024, so he could
> >>> undo some of the BS the corrupt Democrats put in
> >>> place.
> >>>>
> >>>> "Hey, you scurvy capitalist Christian nationalists, I think
> >>>> you stink like hell, that you're smelling up democracy and
> >>>> our rights!"
> >>>
> >>> You're still free to spout that BS to your heart's
> >>> content. Just as long as you don't take it to the
> >>> next step and start attacking churches like some
> >>> of your radical nutcase kook friends.
> >>>>
> >>>> "Donald John's the greatest President we've ever had. And
> >>>> you are a dirty commie and a socialist freak! You're a
> >>>> tool of SATAN!!"
> >>>
> >>> Isn't it great that we have freedom of speech in
> >>> our country? You know in Canada, Australia, and
> >>> the UK, a person could be put in prison for "hate
> >>> speech" that their governments don't like.
> >>>>
> >>>> Fascism spreading like a Santa Ana wildfire.
> >>>
> >>> No, Trump is undoing what the corrupt Democrats
> >>> tried to do to this country -- by trying to take
> >>> away our religious rights that are guaranteed by
> >>> our marvelous Constitution!!! Thank God!!!
> >>
> >> When the national round-up of illegal immigrants first
> >> began early this year, it was widely advertised as
> >> focusing on "dangerous criminals"
> >
> > They said they were going to prioritize dangerous
> > criminals, and remove them first. They never said
> > other illegal aliens would be forever exempt. In
> > fact, they said if they were doing a raid to pick
> > up a dangerous criminal, and there were other
> > illegal aliens there who had no documentation,
> > they would be picked up as well.
> >
> > I'm sorry that you missed that news, but then you
> > are always so ill-informed that I'm not at all
> > surprised that you didn't know the facts I just
> > presented to you.
> >>
> >> that have murdered,
> >> raped and abducted children and adults.
> >
> > Yes, meaning all those murdered children and adults
> > would still be alive if the Biden administration
> > had done their job and secured our border instead
> > of allowing untold numbers of criminals into our
> > country.
> >>
> >> And now it's morphed into imprisoning and deporting
> >> the entire community of illegal immigrants, as more
> >> prisons are being built. Social studies show clearly
> >> that a small percentage are criminals and that
> >> proportionately homegrown citizens are more dangerous.
> >
> > Doc, you can continue to use that flawed argument on
> > me, and it will land with the same thud it does every
> > time you use it. Because I don't want any ADDED crime
> > to what we already have, whether you want that ADDED
> > crime or not. Your argument is so ILLOGICAL that it
> > would be laughable if it weren't so sad.
>
> I asked AI CoPilot this:
> It appears that early this year as Trump took office, it was emphasized
> that DHS's priority was to detain and deport illegal immigrants that
> have criminal profiles. That seemed to be a way to have less resistance
> from the Democrats and leftists since polls showed a majority agreed. I
> certainly did as a Democrat. But Trump's agenda shifted to not making
> that distinction as the year progressed. It became increasingly a
> round-up objective to get all undocumented immigrants - those having no
> criminal profile.
Just so you know, Doc, it's ILLEGAL to enter our country
without going through a port of entry and obtaining some
documentation. That means it's a CRIME to live here with
no documentation. Do you understand that, or do I have to
explain it to you?
Headline: "More Americans want illegal immigrants booted
out of US, even if no criminal record: poll:"
https://nypost.com/2025/10/28/us-news/even-democrats-support-one
part-of-trumps-deportation-plan-poll/
I know this news will come as a shock to you, but some of
us want our country's borders and laws to be respected,
even if you don't.
As for your AI thing, I really don't care what it has to say.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
