From: user6340@newsgrouper.org.invalid   
      
   JTEM  posted:   
   > On 12/26/25 5:00 PM, Mike wrote:   
   >   
   > > Still, nothing you said proves that it was Jesus.   
   >   
   > I find it very hard to believe that it was Jesus. He looks   
   > European. His big, *Hug* by even medieval standards, in   
   > both height and build. This suggests someone of some kind   
   > of status -- probably a knight.   
      
   The height estimates are anywhere from 5'7" to 6'.   
   That's not so out of line with the height of people   
   back then. And remember, Jesus was conceived in a   
   miraculous way.   
   >   
   > Yes, a crusader knight. That's my best guess.   
      
   It's your guess.   
   >   
   > It's too bad we can't see the penis:  Circumcised?   
   >   
   > It wouldn't "Prove" Jewish but it would at least support   
   > the idea that it was Jesus....   
   >   
   > I think it dates to the time suggested by the carbon   
   > dating, and that it's a crusader knight.   
      
   You have to get past that flawed carbon dating.   
   The video I provided explains why that process   
   was flawed.   
   >   
   > THIS DOES NOT RULE OUT A MIRACLE!   
      
   The more I learn about it, the more it's OBVIOUS   
   that it was created by a supernatural process. And   
   that alone could account for the reason the carbon   
   dating was wrong.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)