From: theirony2013@gmail.com   
      
   On 2025-12-26 14:40, Steven Douglas wrote:   
   >   
   > JTEM  posted:   
   >> On 12/26/25 5:00 PM, Mike wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> Still, nothing you said proves that it was Jesus.   
   >>   
   >> I find it very hard to believe that it was Jesus. He looks   
   >> European. His big, *Hug* by even medieval standards, in   
   >> both height and build. This suggests someone of some kind   
   >> of status -- probably a knight.   
   >   
   > The height estimates are anywhere from 5'7" to 6'.   
   > That's not so out of line with the height of people   
   > back then. And remember, Jesus was conceived in a   
   > miraculous way.   
   >>   
   >> Yes, a crusader knight. That's my best guess.   
   >   
   > It's your guess.   
   >>   
   >> It's too bad we can't see the penis:  Circumcised?   
   >>   
   >> It wouldn't "Prove" Jewish but it would at least support   
   >> the idea that it was Jesus....   
   >>   
   >> I think it dates to the time suggested by the carbon   
   >> dating, and that it's a crusader knight.   
   >   
   > You have to get past that flawed carbon dating.   
   > The video I provided explains why that process   
   > was flawed.   
   >>   
   >> THIS DOES NOT RULE OUT A MIRACLE!   
   >   
   > The more I learn about it, the more it's OBVIOUS   
   > that it was created by a supernatural process. And   
   > that alone could account for the reason the carbon   
   > dating was wrong.   
      
   Even if that were true, it still doesn't prove it was Jesus.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)