From: user6340@newsgrouper.org.invalid   
      
   Mike  posted:   
   > On 2025-12-26 14:10, Steven Douglas wrote:   
   > >   
   > > Just because I think CrapGPT is dumb, that doesn't   
   > > mean I think ALL AI things are that dumb. Some of   
   > > them are actually not so bad. But CrapGPT must be   
   > > the worst of them.   
   > >   
   > > The video at the link was suggested to me by YouTube,   
   > > and the guy who created the video spent some time   
   > > asking CrapGPT for some information. The video is   
   > > hilarious, because it shows just how dumb CrapGPT   
   > > really is!   
   > >   
   > > Video title: "I Fried ChatGPT With ONE Simple Question"   
   > >   
   > > https://youtu.be/TiwADS600Jc   
   >   
   > It was a stupid question. No one would ever try to speak   
   > a number that large out loud.   
      
   Ah, you didn't watch the video where the guy had his   
   son actually recite the number from memory. First he   
   asked CrapGPT to give him the number, and it gave him   
   a bunch of garbage. Then he showed his son actually   
   speak the number (while you so definitively declared   
   that no one would ever do that).   
   >   
   > ChatGPT said:   
   >   
   > 52! (factorial) is the number of different possible orderings of a   
   > shuffled deck of playing cards.   
   >   
   > That's a far more sensible way to say the number instead trying to   
   > recite an unnameable number:   
   > 80,658,175,170,943,878,571,660,636,856,403,766,975,289,505,440   
   883,277,824,000,000,000,000   
      
   Hmm, it's such a shame that you didn't watch the kid   
   recite the number -- while the dumb CrapGPT failed to   
   even know the number and gave a false answer. CrapGPT   
   is not a reliable source for information, as the video   
   went on to show beyond the question about that large   
   number.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)