From: user6340@newsgrouper.org.invalid   
      
   Mike  posted:   
   > On 2025-12-26 16:45, Steven Douglas wrote:   
   > > Mike  posted:   
   > >> On 2025-12-26 14:10, Steven Douglas wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Just because I think CrapGPT is dumb, that doesn't   
   > >>> mean I think ALL AI things are that dumb. Some of   
   > >>> them are actually not so bad. But CrapGPT must be   
   > >>> the worst of them.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> The video at the link was suggested to me by YouTube,   
   > >>> and the guy who created the video spent some time   
   > >>> asking CrapGPT for some information. The video is   
   > >>> hilarious, because it shows just how dumb CrapGPT   
   > >>> really is!   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Video title: "I Fried ChatGPT With ONE Simple Question"   
   > >>>   
   > >>> https://youtu.be/TiwADS600Jc   
   > >>   
   > >> It was a stupid question. No one would ever try to speak   
   > >> a number that large out loud.   
   > >   
   > > Ah, you didn't watch the video where the guy had his   
   > > son actually recite the number from memory. First he   
   > > asked CrapGPT to give him the number, and it gave him   
   > > a bunch of garbage. Then he showed his son actually   
   > > speak the number (while you so definitively declared   
   > > that no one would ever do that).   
   > >>   
   > >> ChatGPT said:   
   > >>   
   > >> 52! (factorial) is the number of different possible orderings of a   
   > >> shuffled deck of playing cards.   
   > >>   
   > >> That's a far more sensible way to say the number instead trying to   
   > >> recite an unnameable number:   
   > >> 80,658,175,170,943,878,571,660,636,856,403,766,975,289,505,   
   40,883,277,824,000,000,000,000   
   > >   
   > > Hmm, it's such a shame that you didn't watch the kid   
   > > recite the number -- while the dumb CrapGPT failed to   
   > > even know the number and gave a false answer. CrapGPT   
   > > is not a reliable source for information, as the video   
   > > went on to show beyond the question about that large   
   > > number.   
   >   
   > I did watch. He was a dumb kid.   
      
   He's smarter than that dumb CrapGPT, which kept getting   
   the answer wrong. The kid got it right. This is the   
   correct   
   >   
   > I doubt he even   
   > knows what a factorial is   
      
   His dad (who made the video) must have taught him.   
   >   
   > and no way to validate if he said it correctly.   
      
   Not true. Here it is:   
      
   "Eighty unvigintillion, six hundred fifty-eight vigintillion,   
   one hundred seventy-five novemdecillion, one hundred seventy   
   octodecillion, nine hundred forty-three septendecillion, eight   
   hundred seventy-eight sexdecillion, five hundred seventy-one   
   quindecillion, six hundred sixty quattuordecillion, six hundred   
   thirty-six tredecillion, eight hundred fifty-six duodecillion,   
   four hundred three undecillion, seven hundred sixty-six decillion,   
   nine hundred seventy-five nonillion, two hundred eighty-nine   
   octillion, five hundred five septillion, four hundred forty   
   sextillion, eight hundred eighty-three quintillion, two hundred   
   seventy-seven quadrillion, eight hundred twenty-four trillion."   
      
   Go ahead and check to see if the kid got it right.   
   >   
   > You just believe him?   
      
   Why not? He got it right.   
   >   
   > By the way, is this how you are choosing to celebrate   
   > St. Stephens day?   
      
   You have no idea what I've been doing today. Or   
   do you think the few minutes I've spent on this   
   group is the entirety of my day?   
   >   
   > I would have expected you would be   
   > doing something special.   
      
   I've been out enjoying the beautiful day after all the   
   rain we've had the past few days. Thanks for asking.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)