From: user6340@newsgrouper.org.invalid   
      
   Mike  posted:   
   > On 2025-12-26 18:03, Steven Douglas wrote:   
   > > Mike  posted:   
   > >> On 2025-12-26 16:45, Steven Douglas wrote:   
   > >>> Mike  posted:   
   > >>>> On 2025-12-26 14:10, Steven Douglas wrote:   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Just because I think CrapGPT is dumb, that doesn't   
   > >>>>> mean I think ALL AI things are that dumb. Some of   
   > >>>>> them are actually not so bad. But CrapGPT must be   
   > >>>>> the worst of them.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> The video at the link was suggested to me by YouTube,   
   > >>>>> and the guy who created the video spent some time   
   > >>>>> asking CrapGPT for some information. The video is   
   > >>>>> hilarious, because it shows just how dumb CrapGPT   
   > >>>>> really is!   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Video title: "I Fried ChatGPT With ONE Simple Question"   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> https://youtu.be/TiwADS600Jc   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> It was a stupid question. No one would ever try to speak   
   > >>>> a number that large out loud.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Ah, you didn't watch the video where the guy had his   
   > >>> son actually recite the number from memory. First he   
   > >>> asked CrapGPT to give him the number, and it gave him   
   > >>> a bunch of garbage. Then he showed his son actually   
   > >>> speak the number (while you so definitively declared   
   > >>> that no one would ever do that).   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> ChatGPT said:   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> 52! (factorial) is the number of different possible orderings of a   
   > >>>> shuffled deck of playing cards.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> That's a far more sensible way to say the number instead trying to   
   > >>>> recite an unnameable number:   
   > >>>> 80,658,175,170,943,878,571,660,636,856,403,766,975,289,50   
   ,440,883,277,824,000,000,000,000   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Hmm, it's such a shame that you didn't watch the kid   
   > >>> recite the number -- while the dumb CrapGPT failed to   
   > >>> even know the number and gave a false answer. CrapGPT   
   > >>> is not a reliable source for information, as the video   
   > >>> went on to show beyond the question about that large   
   > >>> number.   
   > >>   
   > >> I did watch. He was a dumb kid.   
   > >   
   > > He's smarter than that dumb CrapGPT, which kept getting   
   > > the answer wrong. The kid got it right. This is the   
   > > correct   
   > >>   
   > >> I doubt he even   
   > >> knows what a factorial is   
   > >   
   > > His dad (who made the video) must have taught him.   
   >   
   > No, his dad was just as dumb, most likely just   
   > copied it from the internet.   
      
   The point is that your CrapGPT couldn't figure it   
   out -- but other AI things did. That's the point,   
   and it's really irrelevant what you think of the   
   guy who made the video. Focus on the point, which   
   is that CrapGPT is a piece of garbage.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)