From: jtem01@gmail.com   
      
   On 12/27/25 3:55 PM, Steven Douglas wrote:   
      
   > Wrong. I'm wondering why you apparently believe   
   > that carbon dating of 1988 is infallible, to the   
   > point you won't even entertain the idea that the   
   > 1988 carbon dating of the Shroud might be wrong.   
      
   If you want to "Argue" that C14 in 1988 was problematic,   
   cite some examples of dating that was more recently   
   dismissed as wrong.   
      
   > So here's something for you to ponder -- a study   
   > that took a thorough look at the flawed processes   
   > that were used by three laboratories that each   
   > came up with different answers.   
      
   C14 produces a range.   
      
      
   > Title: "Statistical and Proactive Analysis of an   
   > Inter-Laboratory Comparison: The Radiocarbon Dating   
   > of the Shroud of Turin"   
   >   
   > [quoting] "Clearly, the statistical analyses do not unveil   
   > the correct age of the Shroud. Our review does not aim to   
   > discuss the so-called 'authenticity' of the Shroud; we show   
   > there are reasons to believe that the 1988 radiocarbon dating   
   > does not match current accuracy requirements. Should this be   
   > the case, it would be interesting to plan a strategy in order   
   > to know the accurate age of the Shroud of Turin." [end quoting]   
      
   Again, what you need is examples of where C14 dating to the   
   same standards as 1988 have been overturned by more recent   
   standards.   
      
      
      
   --   
   https://jtem.tumblr.com/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)