From: user6340@newsgrouper.org.invalid   
      
   Mike  posted:   
   > On 2025-12-27 12:58, Steven Douglas wrote:   
   > > Mike  posted:   
   > >> On 2025-12-26 18:03, Steven Douglas wrote:   
   > >>> Mike  posted:   
   > >>>> On 2025-12-26 16:45, Steven Douglas wrote:   
   > >>>>> Mike  posted:   
   > >>>>>> On 2025-12-26 14:10, Steven Douglas wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> Just because I think CrapGPT is dumb, that doesn't   
   > >>>>>>> mean I think ALL AI things are that dumb. Some of   
   > >>>>>>> them are actually not so bad. But CrapGPT must be   
   > >>>>>>> the worst of them.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> The video at the link was suggested to me by YouTube,   
   > >>>>>>> and the guy who created the video spent some time   
   > >>>>>>> asking CrapGPT for some information. The video is   
   > >>>>>>> hilarious, because it shows just how dumb CrapGPT   
   > >>>>>>> really is!   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> Video title: "I Fried ChatGPT With ONE Simple Question"   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> https://youtu.be/TiwADS600Jc   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> It was a stupid question. No one would ever try to speak   
   > >>>>>> a number that large out loud.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Ah, you didn't watch the video where the guy had his   
   > >>>>> son actually recite the number from memory. First he   
   > >>>>> asked CrapGPT to give him the number, and it gave him   
   > >>>>> a bunch of garbage. Then he showed his son actually   
   > >>>>> speak the number (while you so definitively declared   
   > >>>>> that no one would ever do that).   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> ChatGPT said:   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> 52! (factorial) is the number of different possible orderings of a   
   > >>>>>> shuffled deck of playing cards.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> That's a far more sensible way to say the number instead trying to   
   > >>>>>> recite an unnameable number:   
   > >>>>>> 80,658,175,170,943,878,571,660,636,856,403,766,975,289,   
   05,440,883,277,824,000,000,000,000   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Hmm, it's such a shame that you didn't watch the kid   
   > >>>>> recite the number -- while the dumb CrapGPT failed to   
   > >>>>> even know the number and gave a false answer. CrapGPT   
   > >>>>> is not a reliable source for information, as the video   
   > >>>>> went on to show beyond the question about that large   
   > >>>>> number.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> I did watch. He was a dumb kid.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> He's smarter than that dumb CrapGPT, which kept getting   
   > >>> the answer wrong. The kid got it right. This is the   
   > >>> correct   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> I doubt he even   
   > >>>> knows what a factorial is   
   > >>>   
   > >>> His dad (who made the video) must have taught him.   
   > >>   
   > >> No, his dad was just as dumb, most likely just   
   > >> copied it from the internet.   
   > >   
   > > The point is that your CrapGPT couldn't figure it   
   > > out --   
   >   
   > I didn't have any problems.   
      
   The thing showed how dumb it is when it didn't   
   even know the difference between "it's" and "its".   
   >   
   > I often depends on how the question is asked.   
      
   That's right. It will give an answer depending on   
   what you want it to say. Just give it a leading   
   question, and it will pick right up on the lead   
   it's given and come up with any answer you want.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)