From: user6340@newsgrouper.org.invalid   
      
   JTEM  posted:   
   > On 12/27/25 3:55 PM, Steven Douglas wrote:   
   >   
   > > Wrong. I'm wondering why you apparently believe   
   > > that carbon dating of 1988 is infallible, to the   
   > > point you won't even entertain the idea that the   
   > > 1988 carbon dating of the Shroud might be wrong.   
   >   
   > If you want to "Argue" that C14 in 1988 was problematic,   
   > cite some examples of dating that was more recently   
   > dismissed as wrong.   
      
   I don't need to. The 1988 process was flawed, and   
   the study I provided shows why. One of the labs   
   that was not invited to participate criticized   
   the processes at the time. But you wouldn't know   
   that because your mind is closed -- which precludes   
   you from learning something new.   
      
   Oh, as for other examples -- the Shroud is a one-of-   
   a-kind. There is nothing else like it. That's why   
   it remains controversial. My question to you (that   
   you, of course ignored) is where are all the other   
   shrouds of medieval knights? Why is this the only one?   
   Please explain.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)