From: jtem01@gmail.com   
      
   On 12/27/25 4:25 PM, Steven Douglas wrote:   
      
   > Oh, as for other examples -- the Shroud is a one-of-   
   > a-kind. There is nothing else like it. That's why   
   > it remains controversial.   
      
   You got that wrong, too.   
      
   “Veronica’s Veil.”   
      
   When you're through Googling that try another one.   
      
   "Sudarium of Oviedo."   
      
      
   But it's all irrelevant because this isn't about religious   
   relics, it's about old cloth. Your rationalizations   
   surrounding C14 are concerning cloth. Nothing in the claims   
   requires that the cloth be a religious icon.   
      
         ...say, you're not very good at deconstructing problems   
   and identifying tests, are you?   
      
   Now that I think of it, finding cloth that is both old   
   enough for carbon dating and partially burned, in order to   
   test the rationalization you offer for ignoring the C14   
   results, would be excessively difficult. But what is neither   
   rare now difficult to achieve access to would be materials   
   which old enough and burned... such as wood. So confidently   
   dating charcoal by independent means, then comparing that   
   dating to C14 dating should be a sufficient test of your   
   claims.   
      
   If there's the issues you cling to, I haven't seen them.   
      
      
      
      
      
      
   --   
   https://jtem.tumblr.com/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)