From: user6340@newsgrouper.org.invalid   
      
   Mike  posted:   
   > On 2025-12-27 13:28, Steven Douglas wrote:   
   > > Mike  posted:   
   > >> On 2025-12-27 12:58, Steven Douglas wrote:   
   > >>> Mike  posted:   
   > >>>> On 2025-12-26 18:03, Steven Douglas wrote:   
   > >>>>> Mike  posted:   
   > >>>>>> On 2025-12-26 16:45, Steven Douglas wrote:   
   > >>>>>>> Mike  posted:   
   > >>>>>>>> On 2025-12-26 14:10, Steven Douglas wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> Just because I think CrapGPT is dumb, that doesn't   
   > >>>>>>>>> mean I think ALL AI things are that dumb. Some of   
   > >>>>>>>>> them are actually not so bad. But CrapGPT must be   
   > >>>>>>>>> the worst of them.   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> The video at the link was suggested to me by YouTube,   
   > >>>>>>>>> and the guy who created the video spent some time   
   > >>>>>>>>> asking CrapGPT for some information. The video is   
   > >>>>>>>>> hilarious, because it shows just how dumb CrapGPT   
   > >>>>>>>>> really is!   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> Video title: "I Fried ChatGPT With ONE Simple Question"   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/TiwADS600Jc   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> It was a stupid question. No one would ever try to speak   
   > >>>>>>>> a number that large out loud.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> Ah, you didn't watch the video where the guy had his   
   > >>>>>>> son actually recite the number from memory. First he   
   > >>>>>>> asked CrapGPT to give him the number, and it gave him   
   > >>>>>>> a bunch of garbage. Then he showed his son actually   
   > >>>>>>> speak the number (while you so definitively declared   
   > >>>>>>> that no one would ever do that).   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> ChatGPT said:   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> 52! (factorial) is the number of different possible orderings of a   
   > >>>>>>>> shuffled deck of playing cards.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> That's a far more sensible way to say the number instead trying to   
   > >>>>>>>> recite an unnameable number:   
   > >>>>>>>> 80,658,175,170,943,878,571,660,636,856,403,766,975,28   
   ,505,440,883,277,824,000,000,000,000   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> Hmm, it's such a shame that you didn't watch the kid   
   > >>>>>>> recite the number -- while the dumb CrapGPT failed to   
   > >>>>>>> even know the number and gave a false answer. CrapGPT   
   > >>>>>>> is not a reliable source for information, as the video   
   > >>>>>>> went on to show beyond the question about that large   
   > >>>>>>> number.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> I did watch. He was a dumb kid.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> He's smarter than that dumb CrapGPT, which kept getting   
   > >>>>> the answer wrong. The kid got it right. This is the   
   > >>>>> correct   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> I doubt he even   
   > >>>>>> knows what a factorial is   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> His dad (who made the video) must have taught him.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> No, his dad was just as dumb, most likely just   
   > >>>> copied it from the internet.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> The point is that your CrapGPT couldn't figure it   
   > >>> out --   
   > >>   
   > >> I didn't have any problems.   
   > >   
   > > The thing showed how dumb it is when it didn't   
   > > even know the difference between "it's" and "its".   
   >   
   > No, you're the one that's dumb not to be able   
   > to decipher what it means when it says it can   
   > sometimes make mistakes.   
      
   Of course I acknowledge that it makes mistakes. I've   
   been trying to tell you that ever since you started   
   using it. It is often wrong, which is why I say it's   
   dumb. I suppose I'm expecting more from AI than the   
   very dumb CrapGPT -- but maybe my expectations are   
   too high.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)