From: user6340@newsgrouper.org.invalid   
      
   JTEM  posted:   
   > On 12/27/25 4:25 PM, Steven Douglas wrote:   
   >   
   > >> If you want to "Argue" that C14 in 1988 was problematic,   
   > >> cite some examples of dating that was more recently   
   > >> dismissed as wrong.   
   > >   
   > > I don't need to.   
   >   
   > So you dismiss science   
      
   I dismiss a flawed process, and I'm not sure why you   
   place so much faith in the flawed process.   
   >   
   > in favor of faith in an object.   
      
   As I've told you previously when you kept bringing   
   up the Shroud, I don't need the Shroud to be real   
   in order to believe the truth of the Gospels. But   
   the more I learn about the Shroud, and how it was   
   NOT drawn by an artist (which was a previous but   
   incorrect theory) along with all the other reasons   
   it's not something that could have been created   
   with the lack of technology at the time they   
   claim (incorrectly) that it was created.   
      
   But if you disagree, I would enjoy knowing your   
   theory for how it was created, and why it's the   
   only one of its kind -- and why, if it's a knight,   
   there are no others with other knights from the   
   time you believe it was created.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)