From: user6340@newsgrouper.org.invalid   
      
   DocUFO  posted:   
   >   
   > I asked AI CoPilot:   
      
   Seriously, Doc, is this your way of trying to revive the LYING   
   Little Gang -- by bringing in another voice that agrees with you   
   because of the leading questions you ask it?   
   >   
   > If impeachment cannot be attained and no Senate trial occurs,  what is   
   > legally left for opponents to stop or even reduce Trump's   
   > authoritarianism   
      
   Give an example of Trump's authoritarianism. Just one will   
   do, but of course you'll ignore this because that's what you   
   do when you have no answer -- because your question is   
   based on a false premise.   
   >   
   > or anti-democratic actions   
      
   Says the guy who supported the corrupt Democratic Party's   
   UNdemocratic actions for four years, right up to and including   
   the coup and installation of a replacement WITHOUT A SINGLE   
   VOTE having been cast. Actually, with 14 MILLION votes for   
   Joe Biden being thrown in the trash, and you have the audacity   
   to claim it's Trump who is engaging in UNdemocratic actions?   
   You are too funny sometimes, Doc!   
   >   
   > or increasing signs he's  mentally incompetent?   
      
   Ah, another game of the LYING media and their LYING masters   
   in the corrupt Democratic Party. How many times did the LYING   
   "mainstream" media tell us Biden was sharp as a tack (when we   
   could see for ourselves that he wasn't)? And now the same LIARS   
   who covered up for the feeble and inept Biden are trying to say   
   Trump is the one who is losing it. I will ALWAYS remember that   
   debate, when Biden looked like a feeble old man and Trump   
   looked sharp as a tack. I'll never forget how the Democratic Party   
   dealt with their problem.   
   >   
   > It answered, quoted fully:   
   >   
   > Here’s a clear, grounded, non‑partisan   
      
   HAHAHHHAHAHAHA!!!!!! LOLOLOL!!!!!!!!   
      
   That piece of garbage doesn't seem to understand that the   
   powers of Congress to restrict a president are limited. It did   
   say that the courts would prevent Congress from going too   
   far, as it has tried to do (and failed) in the past with other   
   Congresses and other presidents.   
      
   But even if Congress was able to pass some legislation to   
   restrain Trump's fully Constitutional powers are president,   
   he could veto that legislation. Your question and the thing's   
   response were one big waste of time. I'm glad I couldn't   
   get all the way through it before my eyes glazed over.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)