From: user6340@newsgrouper.org.invalid
DocUFO posted:
> On 12/29/2025 3:05 PM, Steven Douglas wrote:
> > DocUFO posted:
> >>
> >> I asked AI CoPilot:
> >
> > Seriously, Doc, is this your way of trying to revive the LYING
> > Little Gang -- by bringing in another voice that agrees with you
> > because of the leading questions you ask it?
> >>
> >> If impeachment cannot be attained and no Senate trial occurs, what is
> >> legally left for opponents to stop or even reduce Trump's
> >> authoritarianism
> >
> > Give an example of Trump's authoritarianism. Just one will
> > do, but of course you'll ignore this because that's what you
> > do when you have no answer -- because your question is
> > based on a false premise.
> >>
> >> or anti-democratic actions
> >
> > Says the guy who supported the corrupt Democratic Party's
> > UNdemocratic actions for four years, right up to and including
> > the coup and installation of a replacement WITHOUT A SINGLE
> > VOTE having been cast. Actually, with 14 MILLION votes for
> > Joe Biden being thrown in the trash, and you have the audacity
> > to claim it's Trump who is engaging in UNdemocratic actions?
> > You are too funny sometimes, Doc!
> >>
> >> or increasing signs he's mentally incompetent?
> >
> > Ah, another game of the LYING media and their LYING masters
> > in the corrupt Democratic Party. How many times did the LYING
> > "mainstream" media tell us Biden was sharp as a tack (when we
> > could see for ourselves that he wasn't)? And now the same LIARS
> > who covered up for the feeble and inept Biden are trying to say
> > Trump is the one who is losing it. I will ALWAYS remember that
> > debate, when Biden looked like a feeble old man and Trump
> > looked sharp as a tack. I'll never forget how the Democratic Party
> > dealt with their problem.
> >>
> >> It answered, quoted fully:
> >>
> >> Here’s a clear, grounded, non‑partisan
> >
> > HAHAHHHAHAHAHA!!!!!! LOLOLOL!!!!!!!!
> >
> > That piece of garbage doesn't seem to understand that the
> > powers of Congress to restrict a president are limited. It did
> > say that the courts would prevent Congress from going too
> > far, as it has tried to do (and failed) in the past with other
> > Congresses and other presidents.
> >
> > But even if Congress was able to pass some legislation to
> > restrain Trump's fully Constitutional powers are president,
> > he could veto that legislation. Your question and the thing's
> > response were one big waste of time. I'm glad I couldn't
> > get all the way through it before my eyes glazed over.
>
> Quoted from CoPilot:
>
> Here’s the clearest, most grounded way to frame this, Gary — using
> documented facts from the search results and widely accepted definitions
> of authoritarian behavior, without offering my own political opinions.
>
> Your question is essentially:
> Do these actions fit patterns that experts commonly describe as
> authoritarian?
>
> To answer that, I’ll break it into (1) what happened, based on the
> search results, and (2) how scholars typically define authoritarian
> behaviors, so you can see where they intersect.
>
> 📘 How Scholars Define Authoritarian Behavior
> (This is general political‑science theory — not an opinion about any
zzzzzzz ... oh, hey Doc, this is boring. How about an
answer to my question that you have so far (of course)
ignored -- how about an example of Trump's authoritarian
behavior, not just a long-winded explanation of whatever
that thing is trying to say?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
