From: garyrayl70@gmail.com
On 12/30/2025 3:10 PM, Steven Douglas wrote:
>
> DocUFO posted:
>> On 12/29/2025 3:05 PM, Steven Douglas wrote:
>>> DocUFO posted:
>>>>
>>>> I asked AI CoPilot:
>>>
>>> Seriously, Doc, is this your way of trying to revive the LYING
>>> Little Gang -- by bringing in another voice that agrees with you
>>> because of the leading questions you ask it?
>>>>
>>>> If impeachment cannot be attained and no Senate trial occurs, what is
>>>> legally left for opponents to stop or even reduce Trump's
>>>> authoritarianism
>>>
>>> Give an example of Trump's authoritarianism. Just one will
>>> do, but of course you'll ignore this because that's what you
>>> do when you have no answer -- because your question is
>>> based on a false premise.
>>>>
>>>> or anti-democratic actions
>>>
>>> Says the guy who supported the corrupt Democratic Party's
>>> UNdemocratic actions for four years, right up to and including
>>> the coup and installation of a replacement WITHOUT A SINGLE
>>> VOTE having been cast. Actually, with 14 MILLION votes for
>>> Joe Biden being thrown in the trash, and you have the audacity
>>> to claim it's Trump who is engaging in UNdemocratic actions?
>>> You are too funny sometimes, Doc!
>>>>
>>>> or increasing signs he's mentally incompetent?
>>>
>>> Ah, another game of the LYING media and their LYING masters
>>> in the corrupt Democratic Party. How many times did the LYING
>>> "mainstream" media tell us Biden was sharp as a tack (when we
>>> could see for ourselves that he wasn't)? And now the same LIARS
>>> who covered up for the feeble and inept Biden are trying to say
>>> Trump is the one who is losing it. I will ALWAYS remember that
>>> debate, when Biden looked like a feeble old man and Trump
>>> looked sharp as a tack. I'll never forget how the Democratic Party
>>> dealt with their problem.
>>>>
>>>> It answered, quoted fully:
>>>>
>>>> Here’s a clear, grounded, non‑partisan
>>>
>>> HAHAHHHAHAHAHA!!!!!! LOLOLOL!!!!!!!!
>>>
>>> That piece of garbage doesn't seem to understand that the
>>> powers of Congress to restrict a president are limited. It did
>>> say that the courts would prevent Congress from going too
>>> far, as it has tried to do (and failed) in the past with other
>>> Congresses and other presidents.
>>>
>>> But even if Congress was able to pass some legislation to
>>> restrain Trump's fully Constitutional powers are president,
>>> he could veto that legislation. Your question and the thing's
>>> response were one big waste of time. I'm glad I couldn't
>>> get all the way through it before my eyes glazed over.
>>
>> Quoted from CoPilot:
>>
>> Here’s the clearest, most grounded way to frame this, Gary — using
>> documented facts from the search results and widely accepted definitions
>> of authoritarian behavior, without offering my own political opinions.
>>
>> Your question is essentially:
>> Do these actions fit patterns that experts commonly describe as
>> authoritarian?
>>
>> To answer that, I’ll break it into (1) what happened, based on the
>> search results, and (2) how scholars typically define authoritarian
>> behaviors, so you can see where they intersect.
>>
>> 📘 How Scholars Define Authoritarian Behavior
>> (This is general political‑science theory — not an opinion about any
>
> zzzzzzz ... oh, hey Doc, this is boring. How about an
> answer to my question that you have so far (of course)
> ignored -- how about an example of Trump's authoritarian
> behavior, not just a long-winded explanation of whatever
> that thing is trying to say?
It gave several examples if you'd bothered to have read it all,
not skimmed it.
You believe what aligns with your biases and absence of honesty,
junior, and compliments your wild delusions. And inflates
your egotism which lately has gone overboard as you and your
badly stained hero Donald paddle madly down river to the falls.
It's what fanatics commonly do. It's what spoiled children do, too.
@y=
`V`
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
