From: user6340@newsgrouper.org.invalid
DocUFO posted:
> On 12/31/2025 1:17 PM, Steven Douglas wrote:
> > DocUFO posted:
> >> On 12/30/2025 3:20 PM, Steven Douglas wrote:
> >>> DocUFO posted:
> >>>> On 12/29/2025 3:35 PM, Steven Douglas wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> As we saw recently, Doc was completely fooled by a fake
> >>>>> AI video that pretended to show a "Christian" parade in
> >>>>> London -- and Doc fell for it and posted it here as if it were
> >>>>> a real parade that really happened.
> >>>>
> >>>> Subject header: Jesus, Mary and golden angels invade NYC!
> >>>>
> >>>> Not at all! I point out in the above thread how AI creates
> >>>> images that fool many people,
> >>>
> >>> Yes, you tried to cover your tracks by posting this
> >>> after you realized you'd posted that fake parade in
> >>> "London" when you thought it was real.
> >>>>
> >>>> but the easy check is always
> >>>> referencing the news media to find anything to authenticate it,
> >>>> if in fact, one has been lured into accepting it as reality.
> >>>> I point out that NYC, like London in the other AI creation,
> >>>
> >>> Yes, "London" was the one you thought was real when you
> >>> posted it.
> >>
> >> Once again, you've proven you can't differentiate sarcasm or
> >> satire from serious commentary.
> >> It was a mocking commentary meant for the abnormally pious who
> >> often admire gaudiness in religious icons and biblical settings.
> >
> > You directed that to me, when I have never given any
> > reason for you (or anyone else) to believe that I'm
> > a proponent of things that are that kind of "pious",
> > or with that kind of "gaudiness". Yet even after I
> > called you out for posting a FAKE parade that never
> > happened, you STILL tried to get me to say that I
> > must have liked it when I saw it??? Sheesh, Doc,
> > I saw through it right away -- something that you
> > obviously did NOT do, since it's quite clear that
> > you thought it was real.
>
> What sadly is not real is YOU. Your impression of my
> description of the London non-event is simply a gross
> misinterpretation. But since you're such a diehard
> self-inflated character, you think your impressions are
> always correct.
> As I said, you have shown numerous times in this forum
> you can't discern the difference between satiric or
> sarcastic comments and serious content.
> You should've gotten some clue from my subject header
> that purports to be reporting Jesus, Mary and angels
> arriving in London (and later, NYC)! --
>
> *Jesus, Mary and a multitude of angels seen in London*
Yes, of course you were mocking Christianity. That was
obvious. But then you were hoping I would get excited
that a parade such as that was taking place. Even after
I told you it was fake, you STILL asked me if I got
excited about it when I first saw it. Then you started
another thread when you (apparently) realized that the
fake parade video was generated by AI. Here's what you
wrote:
[quoting Doc] "A.I. can do anything. Create gaudy grandiose
parades that, at first glance, appear quite real. Mythical
entities come to life, seemingly real." [end quote]
You were trying to cover-up for the fact that you
had fallen for the fake parade video, but in doing
so you actually gave away that you were ("at first
glace") fooled by it. That quote above appears in
the thread you titled, "A.I. is a suspect in preset
for an Antichrist" -- December 22, 2025.
>
> The actual religious icons did not appear as themselves.
>
> Likewise, Jesus, Mary and the angels weren't "seen"
> in NYC as themselves.
>
> *Jesus, Mary and golden angels invade NYC!*
>
> You really need a course in Remedial Comedy Appreciation.
I knew you were mocking Christianity. It's what you do.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
