home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.prophecies.nostradamus      Worshipping fucknut Nostradamus      125,730 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 124,434 of 125,730   
   Steven Douglas to All   
   Re: Evidence (not proof) of the existenc   
   02 Jan 26 19:44:37   
   
   From: user6340@newsgrouper.org.invalid   
      
   Mike  posted:   
   > On 2026-01-02 09:57, Steven Douglas wrote:   
   > > Mike  posted:   
   > >> On 2026-01-01 16:39, Steven Douglas wrote:   
   > >>> Mike  posted:   
   >   
   > >>>> All I did was copy and pasted the content of your   
   > >>>> message into it and asked for an appropriate rebuttal.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> And it gave an inappropriate rebuttal by making   
   > >>> a false argument out of claims I never made. The   
   > >>> more you post that thing here, the more dumb it   
   > >>> shows itself to be.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> If anyone posted anything false it was obviously you.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Wrong. I posted evidence that IS evidence. That   
   > >>> dumb AI thing (that you think is so great) made   
   > >>> the false argument that I thought I was providing   
   > >>> proof or "definitive" evidence. I'm not sure why   
   > >>> you rely on something so dumb that it doesn't   
   > >>> understand the difference between proof (which   
   > >>> I specifically said I was NOT providing) and   
   > >>> evidence.   
   > >>   
   > >> Everything is some form of evidence, but evidence   
   > >> of what though? Certainly not evidence of the   
   > >> existence of Jesus.   
   > >   
   > > Do you understand the definition of the word   
   > > "evidence"? It's pretty clear that you don't.   
   > >>   
   > >> I would need something far   
   > >> more definitive what you provided.   
   > >   
   > > I provided evidence, even if you don't understand   
   > > what the word means. Just the fact that Jesus has   
   > > become known throughout the world (as He told us   
   > > would be the case in the End Times) is evidence   
   > > of His existence. What historical "myth" has ever   
   > > risen to the prominence that Jesus has?   
   >   
   > Hitler!   
      
   Hitler wasn't a myth. Try again.   
   >   
   > > Why do you think so many ungodly people use the   
   > > name "Jesus" as a swear word?   
   >   
   > I don't use Jesus as a swear word.   
      
   Never?   
   >   
   > I use 'Steven'.   
      
   Sure you do.   
   >   
   > > Why don't they use   
   > > the name "Buddha" as a swear word when they stub   
   > > their toe (for example)? Have you ever thought   
   > > about that?   
   >   
   > I've got more important things to think about.   
      
   Yet here you are, working hard to deny that Jesus   
   didn't exist. Why is this so important to you?   
   >   
   > >>>>>> I don't recall having 'argued' anything.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> You posted the things arguments, which makes those   
   > >>>>> arguments yours since you're the one who posted   
   > >>>>> them. If you're not willing to stand by arguments   
   > >>>>> you post, maybe you shouldn't post them.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Just because something is 'mine' in no way   
   > >>>> implies that I created it.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> If you post it here and stand by it, it's yours.   
   > >>   
   > >> That still doesn't mean that I wrote it, which I didn't.   
   > >   
   > > I didn't say you wrote it, I said you posted it.   
   > > And when you post something in public, you own it.   
   > > Do you think you could post something that is not   
   > > true about someone, and not be found culpable for   
   > > having posted it?   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>>> I'm not really much a   
   > >>>>>> fan or expert of fiction and fantasy.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> You sure work hard at denying what you don't believe.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Copying and pasting isn't 'hard work'. I didn't   
   > >>>> even so much as burden myself with having to read   
   > >>>> them.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> So you also didn't see my rebuttal to its dumb   
   > >>> rebuttal. Why did you even bother to post it?   
   > >>   
   > >> Because it gives me pleasure to see you waste arguing   
   > >> with a 'thing'. You're basically arguing with something   
   > >> as inanimate as a rock.   
   > >   
   > > If this were a private email discussion between the   
   > > two of us, I wouldn't waste my time. But there are   
   > > other people who read this group.   
   >   
   > But no one of any importance.....   
      
   Everyone has importance.   
   >   
   > >> What joy do you get out of that?   
   > >   
   > > I get the joy of spreading the Word of God on the   
   > > internet, with my words going around the world in   
   > > the blink of an eye.   
   >   
   > This is like the proverbial tree falling in the forests.   
   > No one to sees (except in your fantasy), and no one   
   > who cares what a 'character' thinks.   
      
   You care. You prove that with every response.   
   >   
   > >> Why do YOU do it?   
   > >   
   > > Because the truth is the truth, and I will not be   
   > > silenced because you have a dumb AI thing you use   
   > > to do your thinking for you.   
   >   
   > Only a dumb fool would seek truth from an   
   > admitted liar.   
      
   The truth is in the Bible.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca