From: theirony2013@gmail.com   
      
   On 2026-01-02 11:44, Steven Douglas wrote:   
   >   
   > Mike  posted:   
   >> On 2026-01-02 09:57, Steven Douglas wrote:   
   >>> Mike  posted:   
   >>>> On 2026-01-01 16:39, Steven Douglas wrote:   
   >>>>> Mike  posted:   
   >>   
   >>>>>> All I did was copy and pasted the content of your   
   >>>>>> message into it and asked for an appropriate rebuttal.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> And it gave an inappropriate rebuttal by making   
   >>>>> a false argument out of claims I never made. The   
   >>>>> more you post that thing here, the more dumb it   
   >>>>> shows itself to be.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> If anyone posted anything false it was obviously you.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Wrong. I posted evidence that IS evidence. That   
   >>>>> dumb AI thing (that you think is so great) made   
   >>>>> the false argument that I thought I was providing   
   >>>>> proof or "definitive" evidence. I'm not sure why   
   >>>>> you rely on something so dumb that it doesn't   
   >>>>> understand the difference between proof (which   
   >>>>> I specifically said I was NOT providing) and   
   >>>>> evidence.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Everything is some form of evidence, but evidence   
   >>>> of what though? Certainly not evidence of the   
   >>>> existence of Jesus.   
   >>>   
   >>> Do you understand the definition of the word   
   >>> "evidence"? It's pretty clear that you don't.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I would need something far   
   >>>> more definitive what you provided.   
   >>>   
   >>> I provided evidence, even if you don't understand   
   >>> what the word means. Just the fact that Jesus has   
   >>> become known throughout the world (as He told us   
   >>> would be the case in the End Times) is evidence   
   >>> of His existence. What historical "myth" has ever   
   >>> risen to the prominence that Jesus has?   
   >>   
   >> Hitler!   
   >   
   > Hitler wasn't a myth. Try again.   
      
   No, that is Jesus.   
      
      
      
      
   >>   
   >>> Why do you think so many ungodly people use the   
   >>> name "Jesus" as a swear word?   
   >>   
   >> I don't use Jesus as a swear word.   
   >   
   > Never?   
      
   I don't recall ever having once using Jesus   
   as a swear. I might say 'God' but even that   
   would be rare.   
      
   >>   
   >> I use 'Steven'.   
   >   
   > Sure you do.   
      
   I use Douglas too.   
      
      
      
   >>   
   >>> Why don't they use   
   >>> the name "Buddha" as a swear word when they stub   
   >>> their toe (for example)? Have you ever thought   
   >>> about that?   
   >>   
   >> I've got more important things to think about.   
   >   
   > Yet here you are, working hard to deny that Jesus   
   > didn't exist. Why is this so important to you?   
      
   I'm not denying that Jesus 'didn't exist'. I'm   
   denying that he did exist.   
      
      
   >>   
   >>>>>>>> I don't recall having 'argued' anything.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> You posted the things arguments, which makes those   
   >>>>>>> arguments yours since you're the one who posted   
   >>>>>>> them. If you're not willing to stand by arguments   
   >>>>>>> you post, maybe you shouldn't post them.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Just because something is 'mine' in no way   
   >>>>>> implies that I created it.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> If you post it here and stand by it, it's yours.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> That still doesn't mean that I wrote it, which I didn't.   
   >>>   
   >>> I didn't say you wrote it, I said you posted it.   
   >>> And when you post something in public, you own it.   
   >>> Do you think you could post something that is not   
   >>> true about someone, and not be found culpable for   
   >>> having posted it?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> I'm not really much a   
   >>>>>>>> fan or expert of fiction and fantasy.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> You sure work hard at denying what you don't believe.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Copying and pasting isn't 'hard work'. I didn't   
   >>>>>> even so much as burden myself with having to read   
   >>>>>> them.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> So you also didn't see my rebuttal to its dumb   
   >>>>> rebuttal. Why did you even bother to post it?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Because it gives me pleasure to see you waste arguing   
   >>>> with a 'thing'. You're basically arguing with something   
   >>>> as inanimate as a rock.   
   >>>   
   >>> If this were a private email discussion between the   
   >>> two of us, I wouldn't waste my time. But there are   
   >>> other people who read this group.   
   >>   
   >> But no one of any importance.....   
   >   
      
   > Everyone has importance.   
      
   Not to me they don't.   
      
      
   >>   
   >>>> What joy do you get out of that?   
   >>>   
   >>> I get the joy of spreading the Word of God on the   
   >>> internet, with my words going around the world in   
   >>> the blink of an eye.   
   >>   
   >> This is like the proverbial tree falling in the forests.   
   >> No one to sees (except in your fantasy), and no one   
   >> who cares what a 'character' thinks.   
   >   
   > You care. You prove that with every response.   
      
   'Caring' might be too much. Curiosity feels more realistic.   
      
      
   >>   
   >>>> Why do YOU do it?   
   >>>   
   >>> Because the truth is the truth, and I will not be   
   >>> silenced because you have a dumb AI thing you use   
   >>> to do your thinking for you.   
   >>   
   >> Only a dumb fool would seek truth from an   
   >> admitted liar.   
   >   
   > The truth is in the Bible.   
      
   Says an admitted liar?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)