From: user6340@newsgrouper.org.invalid   
      
   Mike posted:   
   > On 2026-01-04 17:20, Steven Douglas wrote:   
   > > Mike posted:   
   > >>   
   > >> TEN CONTROVERSIAL QUESTIONS ABOUT THE BIBLE   
   > >   
   > > I am SO happy to see this continuing interest in the Bible   
   > > on this group! Let's keep this going all through this new   
   > > year and beyond, God willing -- shall we?   
   > >>   
   > >> 1. Is the Bible the literal word of God, or a collection of human   
   > >> writings shaped by culture, politics, and history?   
   > >   
   > > The Bible is the inspired Word of God. There is a reason   
   > > that the Bible has had the positive impact on the world   
   > > that it has, which is why wherever the Bible is observed   
   > > by a society in today's world, there is generally peace   
   > > and democracy.   
   > >   
   > > It's where the Bible is BANNED by a society that you'll   
   > > find dictators, tyranny, and slavery. Also in today's   
   > > world, nations that observe the Bible do not go to war   
   > > with each other. Have you ever stopped to think about that?   
   > >>   
   > >> 2. How historically reliable are the Bible's major events, such as   
   > >> the Exodus, the conquest of Canaan, or the Resurrection?   
   > >   
   > > As time goes by, more and more geological findings have   
   > > confirmed the reliability of many Bible stories. But maybe   
   > > something that atheists don't understand is that believers   
   > > are able to take many parts of the Bible on faith. As the   
   > > Bible says in 2 Corinthians 5:7, "For we walk by faith, not   
   > > by sight."   
   > >   
   > > There's also the fact that the Bible has proven itself to be   
   > > true with its 100% accuracy record on its prophecies that   
   > > have already happened. That makes it quite easy for me   
   > > to accept on faith the parts of the Bible that don't have   
   > > the proof that nonbelievers demand.   
   > >>   
   > >> 3. Why does the Bible contain apparent contradictions, such as   
   > >> differing creation accounts, genealogies, or resurrection stories?   
   > >   
   > > Those are not contradictions. The supposed differences   
   > > in the Creation accounts are not contradictions at all. The   
   > > second chapter is a recounting of what took place in the   
   > > first chapter. Referring to "genealogies" is rather vague,   
   > > so I'm not sure what that's about.   
   > >   
   > > But the resurrection stories in the four Gospels accounts   
   > > are mere differences in minor details. I imagine if those   
   > > stories were all exact copies of each other, the complaint   
   > > from nonbelievers would be that they were all taken from   
   > > the same script.   
   > >>   
   > >> 4. If God is loving and just, why does the Bible describe divine   
   > >> violence, genocide, or commands to kill entire populations?   
   > >   
   > > As I have mentioned to you previously, it's clear that you   
   > > have no idea of the things that were being done by the   
   > > Canaanites. Why don't you ask your AI thing to fill you in   
   > > about some of the practices of the Canaanites? Particularly   
   > > ask it what they did to babies and other children -- and how   
   > > they would play loud music and why they would play loud   
   > > music. Then, if the thing gives you the correct answer, you   
   > > might begin to understand why God was not very happy   
   > > with those people.   
   > >>   
   > >> 5. Does the Bible support slavery, tolerate it, or condemn it, and   
   > >> why is slavery never explicitly abolished?   
   > >   
   > > I have addressed this question numerous times on this group   
   > > through the years, but the quick answer is that the Bible put   
   > > guidelines on slavery. Slavery existed before the Bible, and   
   > > if the Bible had banned slavery, the Bible would have been   
   > > rejected by the people who owned slaves.   
   > >   
   > > But by putting guidelines on how slaves were to be treated,   
   > > the people who owned slaves started treating their slaves   
   > > better. Eventually, Bible-believing societies banned slavery,   
   > > while slavery continues to exist TO THIS VERY DAY in places   
   > > where the Bible is banned.   
   > >>   
   > >> 6. Why are women often portrayed as subordinate, and does the Bible   
   > >> endorse patriarchy or gender inequality?   
   > >   
   > > The Bible teaches that men are to be leaders and protectors   
   > > of their wives and families. It's a shame that some Christian   
   > > men took that as a license to be tyrants over their wives and   
   > > families. But the reality is that we're supposed to put them   
   > > first and sacrifice ourselves for them if necessary, as we are   
   > > taught in Ephesians 5:25: "Husbands, love your wives, just as   
   > > Christ also loved the church." Since Jesus died for us, that   
   > > scripture teaches us to be prepared to die for our wives and   
   > > families if need be.   
   > >>   
   > >> 7. Who decided which books belong in the Bible, and how was the   
   > >> biblical canon formed?   
   > >   
   > > It was a group effort by many different people over the course   
   > > of many years. The result is that we have a collection of books   
   > > in the Bible that have made the world a better place than it   
   > > would be without the Bible -- as is PROVEN by the kinds of   
   > > societies that exist where the Bible is banned. Atheists us the   
   > > kind of world this would be if they ruled the world -- just look   
   > > at the old Soviet Union for one big example, or at a hellhole   
   > > like North Korea.   
   > >>   
   > >> 8. Are biblical moral laws meant to be timeless, or were they only   
   > >> intended for ancient societies and cultures?   
   > >   
   > > Of course they are timeless, which is why the Bible has such   
   > > a profound and positive effect on the world (wherever the   
   > > Bible is observed in the world).   
   > >>   
   > >> 9. Is salvation based on faith, works, divine election, or some   
   > >> combination, and why does the Bible seem to support all of these?   
   > >   
   > > The Bible says belief in Jesus is the ONLY way to salvation,   
   > > as Jesus told us in John 14:6: "I am the way, the truth, and   
   > > the life; no one comes to the Father except through me."   
   > > Additionally, Ephesians 2:8-9 tells us, "For by grace you have   
   > > been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is   
   > > the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast."   
   > >>   
   > >> 10. Did Jesus explicitly claim to be God, or was that belief   
   > >> developed later by his followers?   
   > >   
   > > Being part of the Trinity, Jesus is God. In John 10:30 Jesus   
   > > said, "I and the Father are one."   
   >   
   > Hopefully some of the other people you claim are   
   > reading had the patience, but I didn't have the   
   > patience to read any of that.   
      
   Since your mind is so closed, why did you bother to   
   ask the questions if you didn't want them answered?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|