home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.prophecies.nostradamus      Worshipping fucknut Nostradamus      125,730 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 124,600 of 125,730   
   Steven Douglas to All   
   Re: TEN CONTROVERSIAL QUESTIONS ABOUT TH   
   05 Jan 26 06:22:29   
   
   From: user6340@newsgrouper.org.invalid   
      
   Mike  posted:   
   > On 2026-01-04 17:59, Steven Douglas wrote:   
   > > Mike  posted:   
   > >> On 2026-01-04 17:20, Steven Douglas wrote:   
   > >>> Mike  posted:   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> TEN CONTROVERSIAL QUESTIONS ABOUT THE BIBLE   
   > >>>   
   > >>> I am SO happy to see this continuing interest in the Bible   
   > >>> on this group! Let's keep this going all through this new   
   > >>> year and beyond, God willing -- shall we?   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> 1. Is the Bible the literal word of God, or a collection of human   
   > >>>>       writings shaped by culture, politics, and history?   
   > >>>   
   > >>> The Bible is the inspired Word of God. There is a reason   
   > >>> that the Bible has had the positive impact on the world   
   > >>> that it has, which is why wherever the Bible is observed   
   > >>> by a society in today's world, there is generally peace   
   > >>> and democracy.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> It's where the Bible is BANNED by a society that you'll   
   > >>> find dictators, tyranny, and slavery. Also in today's   
   > >>> world, nations that observe the Bible do not go to war   
   > >>> with each other. Have you ever stopped to think about that?   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> 2. How historically reliable are the Bible's major events, such as   
   > >>>>       the Exodus, the conquest of Canaan, or the Resurrection?   
   > >>>   
   > >>> As time goes by, more and more geological findings have   
   > >>> confirmed the reliability of many Bible stories. But maybe   
   > >>> something that atheists don't understand is that believers   
   > >>> are able to take many parts of the Bible on faith. As the   
   > >>> Bible says in 2 Corinthians 5:7, "For we walk by faith, not   
   > >>> by sight."   
   > >>>   
   > >>> There's also the fact that the Bible has proven itself to be   
   > >>> true with its 100% accuracy record on its prophecies that   
   > >>> have already happened. That makes it quite easy for me   
   > >>> to accept on faith the parts of the Bible that don't have   
   > >>> the proof that nonbelievers demand.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> 3. Why does the Bible contain apparent contradictions, such as   
   > >>>>       differing creation accounts, genealogies, or resurrection   
   stories?   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Those are not contradictions. The supposed differences   
   > >>> in the Creation accounts are not contradictions at all. The   
   > >>> second chapter is a recounting of what took place in the   
   > >>> first chapter. Referring to "genealogies" is rather vague,   
   > >>> so I'm not sure what that's about.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> But the resurrection stories in the four Gospels accounts   
   > >>> are mere differences in minor details. I imagine if those   
   > >>> stories were all exact copies of each other, the complaint   
   > >>> from nonbelievers would be that they were all taken from   
   > >>> the same script.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> 4. If God is loving and just, why does the Bible describe divine   
   > >>>>       violence, genocide, or commands to kill entire populations?   
   > >>>   
   > >>> As I have mentioned to you previously, it's clear that you   
   > >>> have no idea of the things that were being done by the   
   > >>> Canaanites. Why don't you ask your AI thing to fill you in   
   > >>> about some of the practices of the Canaanites? Particularly   
   > >>> ask it what they did to babies and other children -- and how   
   > >>> they would play loud music and why they would play loud   
   > >>> music. Then, if the thing gives you the correct answer, you   
   > >>> might begin to understand why God was not very happy   
   > >>> with those people.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> 5. Does the Bible support slavery, tolerate it, or condemn it, and   
   > >>>>       why is slavery never explicitly abolished?   
   > >>>   
   > >>> I have addressed this question numerous times on this group   
   > >>> through the years, but the quick answer is that the Bible put   
   > >>> guidelines on slavery. Slavery existed before the Bible, and   
   > >>> if the Bible had banned slavery, the Bible would have been   
   > >>> rejected by the people who owned slaves.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> But by putting guidelines on how slaves were to be treated,   
   > >>> the people who owned slaves started treating their slaves   
   > >>> better. Eventually, Bible-believing societies banned slavery,   
   > >>> while slavery continues to exist TO THIS VERY DAY in places   
   > >>> where the Bible is banned.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> 6. Why are women often portrayed as subordinate, and does the Bible   
   > >>>>       endorse patriarchy or gender inequality?   
   > >>>   
   > >>> The Bible teaches that men are to be leaders and protectors   
   > >>> of their wives and families. It's a shame that some Christian   
   > >>> men took that as a license to be tyrants over their wives and   
   > >>> families. But the reality is that we're supposed to put them   
   > >>> first and sacrifice ourselves for them if necessary, as we are   
   > >>> taught in Ephesians 5:25: "Husbands, love your wives, just as   
   > >>> Christ also loved the church." Since Jesus died for us, that   
   > >>> scripture teaches us to be prepared to die for our wives and   
   > >>> families if need be.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> 7. Who decided which books belong in the Bible, and how was the   
   > >>>>       biblical canon formed?   
   > >>>   
   > >>> It was a group effort by many different people over the course   
   > >>> of many years. The result is that we have a collection of books   
   > >>> in the Bible that have made the world a better place than it   
   > >>> would be without the Bible -- as is PROVEN by the kinds of   
   > >>> societies that exist where the Bible is banned. Atheists us the   
   > >>> kind of world this would be if they ruled the world -- just look   
   > >>> at the old Soviet Union for one big example, or at a hellhole   
   > >>> like North Korea.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> 8. Are biblical moral laws meant to be timeless, or were they only   
   > >>>>       intended for ancient societies and cultures?   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Of course they are timeless, which is why the Bible has such   
   > >>> a profound and positive effect on the world (wherever the   
   > >>> Bible is observed in the world).   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> 9. Is salvation based on faith, works, divine election, or some   
   > >>>>       combination, and why does the Bible seem to support all of   
   these?   
   > >>>   
   > >>> The Bible says belief in Jesus is the ONLY way to salvation,   
   > >>> as Jesus told us in John 14:6: "I am the way, the truth, and   
   > >>> the life; no one comes to the Father except through me."   
   > >>> Additionally, Ephesians 2:8-9 tells us, "For by grace you have   
   > >>> been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is   
   > >>> the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast."   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> 10. Did Jesus explicitly claim to be God, or was that belief   
   > >>>>         developed later by his followers?   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Being part of the Trinity, Jesus is God. In John 10:30 Jesus   
   > >>> said, "I and the Father are one."   
   > >>   
   > >> Hopefully some of the other people you claim are   
   > >> reading had the patience, but I didn't have the   
   > >> patience to read any of that.   
   > >   
   > > Since your mind is so closed, why did you bother to   
   > > ask the questions if you didn't want them answered?   
   >   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca