From: theirony2013@gmail.com   
      
   On 2026-01-24 13:25, Steven Douglas wrote:   
   >   
   > Mike  posted:   
   >> On 2026-01-24 12:28, Steven Douglas wrote:   
   >>> Mike  posted:   
   >>>> On 2026-01-24 10:49, Steven Douglas wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> For some reason, there are people in our country who   
   >>>>> believe they do not have to obey the orders of law   
   >>>>> enforcement officers. When a law enforcement officer   
   >>>>> gives you a command, your BEST option is to obey the   
   >>>>> command.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Instead, we're seeing a growing number of people who   
   >>>>> believe they have the right to resist and fight law   
   >>>>> enforcement officers. In every one of those cases,   
   >>>>> the person who resists and fights receives a bad   
   >>>>> outcome.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> But what makes it even worse is when elected officials   
   >>>>> take the side of the people who resist and fight law   
   >>>>> enforcement officers, such as what is happening in   
   >>>>> the corrupt governance in both the State of Minnesota   
   >>>>> and the city of Minneapolis.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Thank God that bonehead Walz is NOT our Vice President   
   >>>>> today. That would have been a disaster of unprecedented   
   >>>>> proportions. That bonehead is INFLAMING the situation   
   >>>>> in Minnesota, where federal law enforcement officers   
   >>>>> are working to ENFORCE the laws of the United States.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> And instead of cooperating, which would remove the   
   >>>>> necessity for ICE and Border Patrol officers to be   
   >>>>> forced to confront criminal illegal aliens on the   
   >>>>> streets (since they SHOULD be picked up before they   
   >>>>> are released from jails, but they're not because   
   >>>>> of sanctuary policies in corrupt states and cities   
   >>>>> run by corrupt Democrats) -- instead of cooperating,   
   >>>>> these corrupt Democrats INFLAME the situation by   
   >>>>> claiming (falsely) that federal officers are not   
   >>>>> well-trained.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> So that encourages some (ill-informed) citizens   
   >>>>> that they have the right to resist and fight the   
   >>>>> LAWFUL orders of ICE and Border Patrol officers.   
   >>>>> And that leads to tragic outcomes like those we   
   >>>>> have seen in the corrupt State of Minnesota in   
   >>>>> recent weeks.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>    
   >>>>   
   >>>> The 1935 Nuremberg Laws stripped Jews of citizenship   
   >>>> and civil rights,   
   >>>   
   >>> Yes, I'm aware of that, and it was wrong and evil.   
   >>> What does it have to do with what I wrote?   
   >>   
   >> Would you like me to ask ChatGPT for you?   
   >   
   > There are no U.S. laws that compare to the Nuremberg Laws.   
   > But if CrapGPT is SO dumb that it thinks otherwise, I'd   
   > love to see what kind of garbage it could spit out about   
   > which group of U.S. citizens it thinks have had their   
   > citizenship stripped by laws that don't exist, but that   
   > probably won't stop the dumb CrapGPT from dreaming up   
   > some pile of garbage.   
   >   
   > What I'd really like to know is what CrapGPT thinks of   
   > elected officials who intentionally try to inflame a   
   > crowd of ignorant people by LYING to them about the   
   > situation I mentioned in my original post in this thread?   
      
   Before I ask, what do you think it might say?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)