From: theirony2013@gmail.com   
      
   On 2026-01-26 13:27, JTEM wrote:   
   > On 1/26/26 4:11 PM, Mike wrote:   
   >   
   >> The repulsion to me isn't really even that they are young.   
   >> I think the problem is that I don't even find them cute,   
   >> attractive, or interesting. We're not really connecting   
   >> on this, even though you're trying hard. But probably I   
   >> would not find a hairless person attractive in a sexual   
   >> kind of way. The guys you have been posting for years   
   >> now don't stir me in any kind of way. I remember it all   
   >> started years ago with that 'hilbilly' young guy that   
   >> you seemed to like. Whatever became of him anyhow?   
   >> I wonder if you even remember. He must be in his mid   
   >> thirties by now.   
   >   
   > The ginger?  He had some mental health issues. The posting   
   > was probably a symptom or at least a reminder so he nuked   
   > everything.   
   >   
   > He was NOT posting nudes when I ran across him. He was a   
   > witch and I was initially interested in his talking about   
   > that.   
   >   
   > Short answer:  I dunno. He vanished, came back and then   
   > vanished again.   
   >   
   >> I think these guys are cute, but kind of like   
   >> a cute puppy, or little baby. At least they're doing   
   >> something that looks interesting, So young isn't my   
   >> problem.   
   >   
   > The one you were afraid to even state whether he had   
   > talent?  I honestly thought he was older. He just struck   
   > me as handsome in a "Mature" way. I was really shocked   
   > when I found out he was only 16 at the time. He's not   
   > even quite 18 now!   
   >   
   > And this Alaskan dude?  His profile says 20, which I   
   > believe, because one of his other videos had a song in   
   > which it says he's 19, and that was from 2024. So he's   
   > due to hit 21 between now & August...   
   >   
   > I would have thought 15!   
   >   
   >> The problem seems more to be that I have in   
   >> the back of my mind that maybe you're a bit of a   
   >> perv (by my standards), not to insult but just an   
   >> analysis of the current situation.   
   >   
   > Lol!  After all of Doc's posts you'd say that about me?   
      
   Docs posts are all women nor do I get the inkling he's   
   trying to attract my attention. My brain tends to filter   
   out things that have no relevance to me.   
      
   >   
   > These are all adults. All of them. And, speaking of pervs:   
   >   
   > Why do you keep imagining a sexual attraction and then   
   > attribute YOUR thoughts to me?   
      
   Well, many of your posts have content where the actors   
   are doing things sexually suggestive, which wouldn't be   
   as bad if I found them even slightly attractive. But you   
   keep posting effeminate queens which I frown upon. Maybe   
   I'm being homophobic but I'm not seeking out stimulation   
   that does not interest me. You're the one posting them.   
   They are not coming from me.   
      
   I'm not even sure why you keep pressing the issue when   
   I've told you numerous times that they annoy and irritate me.   
   I still don't understand why you seem to hope I will participate.   
   You are obviously getting away with it, because here we're   
   discussing things that I would have no interest in discussing   
   otherwise. I think I've put in enough effort already to deflect   
   from these kinds of conversations. I don't feel like I need to   
   post every guy I like, or think I have 'potential'. I don't see   
   what's to gain from that. When I show you a guy I like, you don't   
   seem interested either. I've just come to conclude we have totally   
   different tastes, and vastly different criteria for 'talent'. My   
   loos definition of talent is if I feel compelled to watch it   
   again, then that's what I consider talent in any way meaningful   
   to me. A poet can have talent but still wouldn't interest me.   
   Poetry is not my cup of tea, so to speak.   
      
   >   
   > I never said that I was lusting after Alaskan blonde   
   > boi. I asked if anyone got a ping on their gaydar WHICH   
   > YOU NEVER ANSWERED.   
      
   ALL the guys you've posted so far give me that ping'   
   you're talking about of being gay. I figure that's   
   what attracts you. It's not that hard to to figure out.   
   Plus, you keep posting that someone at Facebook thinks   
   you are gay, which leads me to the the belief that   
   Facebook has come to the same conclusion that I have.   
      
   >   
   > That's very typical of you. You kind of steer your very   
   > own course and then tell me that it's my course!   
      
   Frankly, I would prefer that you stop showing me these   
   guys that all basically make me cringe. Just stop posting   
   them to get my attention and there won't be any problems.   
   This is your course, not mine...   
      
   >   
   > *My* course was "Does this guy give you a ping on your   
   > gaydar?"   
   >   
   > That's it.   
      
   They all do, or have done so far. If you can't see   
   that a guy looks like a queen how do you expect me   
   to help. Most people I know have that inert instinct,   
   though I admit one could sometimes could be wrong. When   
   I see an effeminate guy claiming to be straight, I just   
   assume my senses are right and he is just trying to   
   cover it up. I've seen enough of that to know that   
   it frequently happens.   
      
   >   
   > And, yeah, the fact that I considered that he may be   
   > trans because he had not a hair on his face.   
      
   I wouldn't even bother to wonder, which leads me to   
   question why you even care? Obviously there is something   
   motivating you to wonder if someone is trans. My general   
   instincts in that situation is not to wonder but just   
   distance myself from what does not appeal to me. You're   
   the one that's projecting all this onto me.   
      
   >   
   > Btw; I don't think he's ugly. I also don't think he   
   > posts anything erotic!   
      
   I didn't think he was 'ugly', nor did I watch long enough   
   to see if there was anything 'erotic'. My brain just went   
   'nothing here to see', nothing really to talk about.   
      
      
   > Please, STOP attributing your thoughts to me!   
      
   Then stop posting that someone at Facebook thinks   
   you are gay, eliciting my explanation of why they   
   might think that. If someone at Facebook thinks   
   you are gay there must be a reason for it, nor do   
   I see why that should be any of my business.   
      
   >   
   > And if those thoughts you keep attributing to me are   
   > perverted, learn to forgive yourself. This repression   
   > is what is pumping them *Way* out of proportion of   
   > what they would me.   
      
   How come I'm not attributing such thoughts to Steven then?   
   The answer is obvious. Steven is not addressing every second   
   posts to me asking what's my impression of some effeminate guy.   
   There's got to be a clinical term for what you are doing.   
   If your assessments are true then those are my personal problem.   
   I don't see why you have to make them your problem by violating   
   my stated boundaries. To be clear, I would prefer not to see them,   
   unless you change your taste to something I find more interesting.   
      
   >   
   > It's okay to find young gals & dudes attractive,   
   > particularly as they are over the age of consent.   
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)