From: theirony2013@gmail.com   
      
   On 2026-01-27 12:55, JTEM wrote:   
   > On 1/26/26 5:30 PM, Mike wrote:   
   >   
   >> Docs posts are all women nor do I get the inkling he's   
   >> trying to attract my attention. My brain tends to filter   
   >> out things that have no relevance to me.   
   >   
   > It's okay to make it all about you but you keep making it   
   > about you and misattribute it to me.   
   >   
   > And, quite frankly, men who find legally consenting adults,   
   > who are also young, attractive are not perverted. Don't call   
   > them perverts. That's offensive & hostile. You're inviting   
   > an offensive & hostile response. No, call them what they are:   
   >   
   > NORMAL!   
   >   
   > It's normal. It really honestly is. And maybe when you were   
   > young you thought you were "Safe" if it was only people on   
   > the fringes, "Those perverts," who thought a young man like   
   > you was attractive. But they weren't the problem. They were   
   > normal. The problem was you!  YOU weren't telling them to   
   > "Fuck off!" and you needed to, if you weren't attracted to   
   > them.   
   >   
   > Simple as that.   
   >   
   > Odd, isn't it, that you habitually make everything about you,   
   > when responding to me, EXCEPT in the one example when it   
   > honestly was all about you!   
   >   
   > YOU were the problem and YOU were the solution!   
   >   
   > ALSO:  Some certified "Young" though legally consenting adults   
   > are into older people!  Some are just looking for a sugar daddy,   
   > which is okay if they're open about that, and some honestly   
   > are into "Daddy Types."   
   >   
   > Jeeze!  I had a 19 y.o. trans man ask me if I wanted to make a   
   > porn with them!   
   >   
   > "I'm too old, too ugly and too far away," I told them.   
   >   
   > "Too bad," was the response from someone I shared this story with   
   > a few years ago...   
   >   
   >   
   > Anyway, you're older, you know damn well how attractive a young   
   > person, in their physical prime, can be, even if you won't admit   
   > it. At a rock bottom minimum you subconsciously realize how   
   > much you'd like to be bagging these college aged folks... yes you   
   > do. And instead of waking up, instead of realizing "Gee. I was   
   > wrong," you are repulsed by it... "Omg, I'm one of those perverted   
   > monsters!"   
   >   
   > At least your subconscious is seeing all this...   
   >   
   > But, no, you were wrong. They weren't monsters for wanted you,   
   > even though you were younger. They were normal. And you're normal   
   > for finding 20 year olds yummy.   
   >   
   > Get over it. Accept it and move on. Girl or guy, chances are they   
   > are no more interested in any of us than you really were of them,   
   > when you were that age. And they're not afraid of saying so.   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> These are all adults. All of them. And, speaking of pervs:   
   >>>   
   >>> Why do you keep imagining a sexual attraction and then   
   >>> attribute YOUR thoughts to me?   
   >>   
   >> Well, many of your posts have content where the actors   
   >> are doing things sexually suggestive, which wouldn't be   
   >> as bad if I found them even slightly attractive. But you   
   >> keep posting effeminate queens which I frown upon. Maybe   
   >> I'm being homophobic but I'm not seeking out stimulation   
   >> that does not interest me. You're the one posting them.   
   >> They are not coming from me.   
   >>   
   >> I'm not even sure why you keep pressing the issue when   
   >> I've told you numerous times that they annoy and irritate me.   
   >> I still don't understand why you seem to hope I will participate.   
   >> You are obviously getting away with it, because here we're   
   >> discussing things that I would have no interest in discussing   
   >> otherwise. I think I've put in enough effort already to deflect   
   >> from these kinds of conversations. I don't feel like I need to   
   >> post every guy I like, or think I have 'potential'. I don't see   
   >> what's to gain from that. When I show you a guy I like, you don't   
   >> seem interested either. I've just come to conclude we have totally   
   >> different tastes, and vastly different criteria for 'talent'. My   
   >> loos definition of talent is if I feel compelled to watch it   
   >> again, then that's what I consider talent in any way meaningful   
   >> to me. A poet can have talent but still wouldn't interest me.   
   >> Poetry is not my cup of tea, so to speak.   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> I never said that I was lusting after Alaskan blonde   
   >>> boi. I asked if anyone got a ping on their gaydar WHICH   
   >>> YOU NEVER ANSWERED.   
   >>   
   >> ALL the guys you've posted so far give me that ping'   
   >> you're talking about of being gay. I figure that's   
   >> what attracts you. It's not that hard to to figure out.   
   >> Plus, you keep posting that someone at Facebook thinks   
   >> you are gay, which leads me to the the belief that   
   >> Facebook has come to the same conclusion that I have.   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> That's very typical of you. You kind of steer your very   
   >>> own course and then tell me that it's my course!   
   >>   
   >> Frankly, I would prefer that you stop showing me these   
   >> guys that all basically make me cringe. Just stop posting   
   >> them to get my attention and there won't be any problems.   
   >> This is your course, not mine...   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> *My* course was "Does this guy give you a ping on your   
   >>> gaydar?"   
   >>>   
   >>> That's it.   
   >>   
   >> They all do, or have done so far. If you can't see   
   >> that a guy looks like a queen how do you expect me   
   >> to help. Most people I know have that inert instinct,   
   >> though I admit one could sometimes could be wrong. When   
   >> I see an effeminate guy claiming to be straight, I just   
   >> assume my senses are right and he is just trying to   
   >> cover it up. I've seen enough of that to know that   
   >> it frequently happens.   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> And, yeah, the fact that I considered that he may be   
   >>> trans because he had not a hair on his face.   
   >>   
   >> I wouldn't even bother to wonder, which leads me to   
   >> question why you even care? Obviously there is something   
   >> motivating you to wonder if someone is trans. My general   
   >> instincts in that situation is not to wonder but just   
   >> distance myself from what does not appeal to me. You're   
   >> the one that's projecting all this onto me.   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> Btw; I don't think he's ugly. I also don't think he   
   >>> posts anything erotic!   
   >>   
   >> I didn't think he was 'ugly', nor did I watch long enough   
   >> to see if there was anything 'erotic'. My brain just went   
   >> 'nothing here to see', nothing really to talk about.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>> Please, STOP attributing your thoughts to me!   
   >>   
   >> Then stop posting that someone at Facebook thinks   
   >> you are gay, eliciting my explanation of why they   
   >> might think that. If someone at Facebook thinks   
   >> you are gay there must be a reason for it, nor do   
   >> I see why that should be any of my business.   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> And if those thoughts you keep attributing to me are   
   >>> perverted, learn to forgive yourself. This repression   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)