From: jtem01@gmail.com   
      
   On 1/26/26 5:30 PM, Mike wrote:   
      
   > Docs posts are all women nor do I get the inkling he's   
   > trying to attract my attention. My brain tends to filter   
   > out things that have no relevance to me.   
      
   It's okay to make it all about you but you keep making it   
   about you and misattribute it to me.   
      
   And, quite frankly, men who find legally consenting adults,   
   who are also young, attractive are not perverted. Don't call   
   them perverts. That's offensive & hostile. You're inviting   
   an offensive & hostile response. No, call them what they are:   
      
   NORMAL!   
      
   It's normal. It really honestly is. And maybe when you were   
   young you thought you were "Safe" if it was only people on   
   the fringes, "Those perverts," who thought a young man like   
   you was attractive. But they weren't the problem. They were   
   normal. The problem was you!  YOU weren't telling them to   
   "Fuck off!" and you needed to, if you weren't attracted to   
   them.   
      
   Simple as that.   
      
   Odd, isn't it, that you habitually make everything about you,   
   when responding to me, EXCEPT in the one example when it   
   honestly was all about you!   
      
   YOU were the problem and YOU were the solution!   
      
   ALSO:  Some certified "Young" though legally consenting adults   
   are into older people!  Some are just looking for a sugar daddy,   
   which is okay if they're open about that, and some honestly   
   are into "Daddy Types."   
      
   Jeeze!  I had a 19 y.o. trans man ask me if I wanted to make a   
   porn with them!   
      
   "I'm too old, too ugly and too far away," I told them.   
      
   "Too bad," was the response from someone I shared this story with   
   a few years ago...   
      
      
   Anyway, you're older, you know damn well how attractive a young   
   person, in their physical prime, can be, even if you won't admit   
   it. At a rock bottom minimum you subconsciously realize how   
   much you'd like to be bagging these college aged folks... yes you   
   do. And instead of waking up, instead of realizing "Gee. I was   
   wrong," you are repulsed by it... "Omg, I'm one of those perverted   
   monsters!"   
      
   At least your subconscious is seeing all this...   
      
   But, no, you were wrong. They weren't monsters for wanted you,   
   even though you were younger. They were normal. And you're normal   
   for finding 20 year olds yummy.   
      
   Get over it. Accept it and move on. Girl or guy, chances are they   
   are no more interested in any of us than you really were of them,   
   when you were that age. And they're not afraid of saying so.   
      
      
      
      
      
      
   >   
   >>   
   >> These are all adults. All of them. And, speaking of pervs:   
   >>   
   >> Why do you keep imagining a sexual attraction and then   
   >> attribute YOUR thoughts to me?   
   >   
   > Well, many of your posts have content where the actors   
   > are doing things sexually suggestive, which wouldn't be   
   > as bad if I found them even slightly attractive. But you   
   > keep posting effeminate queens which I frown upon. Maybe   
   > I'm being homophobic but I'm not seeking out stimulation   
   > that does not interest me. You're the one posting them.   
   > They are not coming from me.   
   >   
   > I'm not even sure why you keep pressing the issue when   
   > I've told you numerous times that they annoy and irritate me.   
   > I still don't understand why you seem to hope I will participate.   
   > You are obviously getting away with it, because here we're   
   > discussing things that I would have no interest in discussing   
   > otherwise. I think I've put in enough effort already to deflect   
   > from these kinds of conversations. I don't feel like I need to   
   > post every guy I like, or think I have 'potential'. I don't see   
   > what's to gain from that. When I show you a guy I like, you don't   
   > seem interested either. I've just come to conclude we have totally   
   > different tastes, and vastly different criteria for 'talent'. My   
   > loos definition of talent is if I feel compelled to watch it   
   > again, then that's what I consider talent in any way meaningful   
   > to me. A poet can have talent but still wouldn't interest me.   
   > Poetry is not my cup of tea, so to speak.   
   >   
   >>   
   >> I never said that I was lusting after Alaskan blonde   
   >> boi. I asked if anyone got a ping on their gaydar WHICH   
   >> YOU NEVER ANSWERED.   
   >   
   > ALL the guys you've posted so far give me that ping'   
   > you're talking about of being gay. I figure that's   
   > what attracts you. It's not that hard to to figure out.   
   > Plus, you keep posting that someone at Facebook thinks   
   > you are gay, which leads me to the the belief that   
   > Facebook has come to the same conclusion that I have.   
   >   
   >>   
   >> That's very typical of you. You kind of steer your very   
   >> own course and then tell me that it's my course!   
   >   
   > Frankly, I would prefer that you stop showing me these   
   > guys that all basically make me cringe. Just stop posting   
   > them to get my attention and there won't be any problems.   
   > This is your course, not mine...   
   >   
   >>   
   >> *My* course was "Does this guy give you a ping on your   
   >> gaydar?"   
   >>   
   >> That's it.   
   >   
   > They all do, or have done so far. If you can't see   
   > that a guy looks like a queen how do you expect me   
   > to help. Most people I know have that inert instinct,   
   > though I admit one could sometimes could be wrong. When   
   > I see an effeminate guy claiming to be straight, I just   
   > assume my senses are right and he is just trying to   
   > cover it up. I've seen enough of that to know that   
   > it frequently happens.   
   >   
   >>   
   >> And, yeah, the fact that I considered that he may be   
   >> trans because he had not a hair on his face.   
   >   
   > I wouldn't even bother to wonder, which leads me to   
   > question why you even care? Obviously there is something   
   > motivating you to wonder if someone is trans. My general   
   > instincts in that situation is not to wonder but just   
   > distance myself from what does not appeal to me. You're   
   > the one that's projecting all this onto me.   
   >   
   >>   
   >> Btw; I don't think he's ugly. I also don't think he   
   >> posts anything erotic!   
   >   
   > I didn't think he was 'ugly', nor did I watch long enough   
   > to see if there was anything 'erotic'. My brain just went   
   > 'nothing here to see', nothing really to talk about.   
   >   
   >   
   >> Please, STOP attributing your thoughts to me!   
   >   
   > Then stop posting that someone at Facebook thinks   
   > you are gay, eliciting my explanation of why they   
   > might think that. If someone at Facebook thinks   
   > you are gay there must be a reason for it, nor do   
   > I see why that should be any of my business.   
   >   
   >>   
   >> And if those thoughts you keep attributing to me are   
   >> perverted, learn to forgive yourself. This repression   
   >> is what is pumping them *Way* out of proportion of   
   >> what they would me.   
   >   
   > How come I'm not attributing such thoughts to Steven then?   
   > The answer is obvious. Steven is not addressing every second   
   > posts to me asking what's my impression of some effeminate guy.   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)