From: theirony2013@gmail.com   
      
   On 2026-01-27 13:37, Mike wrote:   
   > On 2026-01-27 12:55, JTEM wrote:   
   >> On 1/26/26 5:30 PM, Mike wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> Docs posts are all women nor do I get the inkling he's   
   >>> trying to attract my attention. My brain tends to filter   
   >>> out things that have no relevance to me.   
   >>   
   >> It's okay to make it all about you but you keep making it   
   >> about you and misattribute it to me.   
   >>   
   >> And, quite frankly, men who find legally consenting adults,   
   >> who are also young, attractive are not perverted. Don't call   
   >> them perverts. That's offensive & hostile. You're inviting   
   >> an offensive & hostile response. No, call them what they are:   
   >>   
   >> NORMAL!   
      
   I totally understand that vantage. People are attracted   
   to a variety of things. What's not normal is your need to   
   keep pointing them out to me, even though I have been clear   
   they do not interest.   
      
   I would find it just as annoying when straight guys   
   keep pointing out women to me. It's having a disregard   
   for others boundaries.   
      
      
   >>   
   >> It's normal. It really honestly is. And maybe when you were   
   >> young you thought you were "Safe" if it was only people on   
   >> the fringes, "Those perverts," who thought a young man like   
   >> you was attractive. But they weren't the problem. They were   
   >> normal. The problem was you!  YOU weren't telling them to   
   >> "Fuck off!" and you needed to, if you weren't attracted to   
   >> them.   
   >>   
   >> Simple as that.   
   >>   
   >> Odd, isn't it, that you habitually make everything about you,   
   >> when responding to me, EXCEPT in the one example when it   
   >> honestly was all about you!   
      
   How would you prefer I handle them. Just not respond to them?   
   I am willing to handle it that way. By responding I've only   
   been trying to be courteous. From now on then, I just won't   
   bother to click on them.   
      
   >>   
   >> YOU were the problem and YOU were the solution!   
      
   That makes sense, from now on, I just won't click on them.   
      
      
   >>   
   >> ALSO:  Some certified "Young" though legally consenting adults   
   >> are into older people!  Some are just looking for a sugar daddy,   
   >> which is okay if they're open about that, and some honestly   
   >> are into "Daddy Types."   
      
   Yes 'if they're open about that' is the key point you make.   
   I'm not 'open about that'.   
      
      
   >>   
   >> Jeeze!  I had a 19 y.o. trans man ask me if I wanted to make a   
   >> porn with them!   
   >>   
   >> "I'm too old, too ugly and too far away," I told them.   
   >>   
   >> "Too bad," was the response from someone I shared this story with   
   >> a few years ago...   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Anyway, you're older, you know damn well how attractive a young   
   >> person, in their physical prime, can be, even if you won't admit   
   >> it.   
      
   I don't see the guys that you post as that. They are young   
   effeminate freaks, that I would be ashamed to associate with.   
      
      
      
      
      
   > At a rock bottom minimum you subconsciously realize how   
   >> much you'd like to be bagging these college aged folks... yes you   
   >> do. And instead of waking up, instead of realizing "Gee. I was   
   >> wrong," you are repulsed by it... "Omg, I'm one of those perverted   
   >> monsters!"   
   >>   
   >> At least your subconscious is seeing all this...   
   >>   
   >> But, no, you were wrong. They weren't monsters for wanted you,   
   >> even though you were younger. They were normal. And you're normal   
   >> for finding 20 year olds yummy.   
   >>   
   >> Get over it. Accept it and move on. Girl or guy, chances are they   
   >> are no more interested in any of us than you really were of them,   
   >> when you were that age. And they're not afraid of saying so.   
      
   I just won't bother to click on your Facebook links from now on.   
   That should more than solve the problem until you find another   
   'work around' to try and violate my stated boundaries.  Steven   
   says he doesn't click on most of your Facebook links. In this   
   circumstance I think it wise to take a lesson from him.   
      
      
      
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> These are all adults. All of them. And, speaking of pervs:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Why do you keep imagining a sexual attraction and then   
   >>>> attribute YOUR thoughts to me?   
   >>>   
   >>> Well, many of your posts have content where the actors   
   >>> are doing things sexually suggestive, which wouldn't be   
   >>> as bad if I found them even slightly attractive. But you   
   >>> keep posting effeminate queens which I frown upon. Maybe   
   >>> I'm being homophobic but I'm not seeking out stimulation   
   >>> that does not interest me. You're the one posting them.   
   >>> They are not coming from me.   
   >>>   
   >>> I'm not even sure why you keep pressing the issue when   
   >>> I've told you numerous times that they annoy and irritate me.   
   >>> I still don't understand why you seem to hope I will participate.   
   >>> You are obviously getting away with it, because here we're   
   >>> discussing things that I would have no interest in discussing   
   >>> otherwise. I think I've put in enough effort already to deflect   
   >>> from these kinds of conversations. I don't feel like I need to   
   >>> post every guy I like, or think I have 'potential'. I don't see   
   >>> what's to gain from that. When I show you a guy I like, you don't   
   >>> seem interested either. I've just come to conclude we have totally   
   >>> different tastes, and vastly different criteria for 'talent'. My   
   >>> loos definition of talent is if I feel compelled to watch it   
   >>> again, then that's what I consider talent in any way meaningful   
   >>> to me. A poet can have talent but still wouldn't interest me.   
   >>> Poetry is not my cup of tea, so to speak.   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I never said that I was lusting after Alaskan blonde   
   >>>> boi. I asked if anyone got a ping on their gaydar WHICH   
   >>>> YOU NEVER ANSWERED.   
   >>>   
   >>> ALL the guys you've posted so far give me that ping'   
   >>> you're talking about of being gay. I figure that's   
   >>> what attracts you. It's not that hard to to figure out.   
   >>> Plus, you keep posting that someone at Facebook thinks   
   >>> you are gay, which leads me to the the belief that   
   >>> Facebook has come to the same conclusion that I have.   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> That's very typical of you. You kind of steer your very   
   >>>> own course and then tell me that it's my course!   
   >>>   
   >>> Frankly, I would prefer that you stop showing me these   
   >>> guys that all basically make me cringe. Just stop posting   
   >>> them to get my attention and there won't be any problems.   
   >>> This is your course, not mine...   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> *My* course was "Does this guy give you a ping on your   
   >>>> gaydar?"   
   >>>>   
   >>>> That's it.   
   >>>   
   >>> They all do, or have done so far. If you can't see   
   >>> that a guy looks like a queen how do you expect me   
   >>> to help. Most people I know have that inert instinct,   
   >>> though I admit one could sometimes could be wrong. When   
   >>> I see an effeminate guy claiming to be straight, I just   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)