home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.religion      Nah-uh! My God is better than YOUR God!      192,254 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 190,334 of 192,254   
   servant to and he   
   Re: (4) How can you explain this?   
   04 May 23 18:20:32   
   
   XPost: alt.bible, alt.religion.christian.biblestudy, alt.religion.christianity   
      
   >>Friend james asks for help in bible translation:   
   >>   
   >>>>>Again explain 'God the Son's'comment here:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Matthew 24:36  But of that day and hour knoweth no one, not even the   
   >>>>>angels of heaven, neither the Son, but the Father only.   
   >>   
   >>Correction, that is the kjv Mark version, here is the Matthew:   
   >>   
   >>24:36 But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of   
   >>heaven, but my Father only.   
   >>   
   >>I see the nwt ""corrected"" the difference and made both say the same   
   >>thing, how interesting, no?   
   >>   
   >>Before about 1950 the jw vatican used the kjv, how did they account for   
   >>the difference they read before they "fixed" it?   
   Note, the above was not answered.  Could it be because it is another jw   
   vatican flip flop, one among many many?   
      
   >>   
   >>Let's rise above cherry picking single verses about "father/son".  John in   
   >>3 places has Christ saying He was God   
   >   
   >I am aware of the false translation of John 1:1, but what  are the   
   >other two places?   
      
   They are in addition to John 1:1.   
      
   Smile, whehn measured against 99 percent of greek scholars who say the jw   
   vatican John 1:1 "fix" of scripture is "full of it".  The jw vatican   
   desperately prading the 1 percent who might agree is a dim light indeed,   
   no?  The jw vatican having *no* scholars of greek makes them an ever   
   growing dimmer light, no?   
   >   
   >>, "the father and I are one",   
   >   
   >One what? One substance?   
   >They are one in agreements and morality issues etc.   
   >   
   Paul corrects, Col. 2:9 For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead   
   bodily.   
   >   
   >> "if you   
   >>>see me you see the father"   
   >   
   >No way literally.No one may see God and live to tell about it.   
      
   Paul's correction applies once more "dwells the godhead bodily";, no?   
   Christ was the God/man.   
      
   and he said "I am"; the name given Moses for   
   >>the name of God.   
   >   
   How do we know that Christ was in fact claiming to be God in his   
   father/son nature?  The jews who heard Him sought to kill Him, they said He   
   deserved death for the 'blasphemy", their word, for making himself God.   
   >   
   >>Paul speaks of this union of persons,ie. father/son   
   >>Colossians   
   >>2:9 For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.   
   >   
   >Another translation problem "Godhead".   
   >   
   >Colossians 2:10  And ye are complete in him, which is the head of all   
   >principality and power:   
      
   Friend james did we just catch you trying to pull a fast one?  The word   
   "godhead" doesn't appear there.  The words do not contridict what Paul just   
   wrote in the previous verse.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca