home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.religion      Nah-uh! My God is better than YOUR God!      192,254 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 190,409 of 192,254   
   servant to All   
   Re: Exposed; jw vatican fails Paul's "pr   
   18 May 23 14:50:38   
   
   XPost: alt.bible, alt.religion.christian.biblestudy, alt.religion.christianity   
   XPost: alt.christnet.bible   
      
   >>>>A jw vatican claim:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>"The incredible claim that earthquakes have increased 20 fold since 1914   
   >>>>has been used as an illegitimate way to convince Jehovah's Witnesses we are   
   >>>>living in the "last days." This is related to Jesus' statement in Luke   
   >>>>21:11 that there will be "great earthquakes" as a sign of the "end."   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Hmmm, has friend james followed Paul to "prove all things" on this claim?   
   >>>>Let's hehlp him out, in short when God's 2nd revelation is observed in the   
   >>>>"ever brighter light" of science He provides; short answer - it is pure   
   >>>>bovine excrement.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Friend james can now turn the spotlight of Paul's test on the jw vatican   
   >>>>itself that he might "prove all things" about jw vatican claims in all   
   >>>>areas.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>The jw vatican says something like; "the news these days if full of   
   >>>>earthquake reports".  That is poured backward into the Luke above and the   
   >>>>circular logic is complete.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>"See" they say, its happening and we know because the bible told us.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>In other words, the jw vatican is correct because it says it is so based on   
   >>>>the filling backward the Luke. The jw vatican did not follow Paul's "prove   
   >>>>all things", no?   
   >>>   
   >Good sunrise,   
   >   
   >>Friend james causes me to be embarrassed for him again, follow the   
   >>jw vatican inspired circulaar logic below:   
   >>   
   >>>It all depends what the Bible meant by those earthquakes. Did it mean   
   >>>there would literally be more of them? Or that the REPORTING of them   
   >>>would increase? (   
   >>   
   >>Bingo, back fill the Luke with "could be" speculation to excuse the jw   
   >>vatican failed prediction; read them; not more reporting but 20 times more   
   >>quakes period:   
   >   
   >For the 20 times, see below.   
   >   
   >>   
   >   
   >>   In 1984, Survival into a New Earth proclaimed;   
   >>   
   >   
   >>     "The frequency of major earthquakes has increased to about 20 times   
   >>what it was on an average during the two thousand years before 1914."   
   >>Survival   
   >>     into a New Earth (1984) p.23   
   >>   
   >   
   >>   The following year, Reasoning from the Scriptures repeated this claim.   
   >>     "This means that, in comparison with the previous 2,000 years, the   
   >>average per year has been 20 times as great since 1914." Reasoning from the   
   >>     Scriptures (1985) p.236   
   >>   
   >   
   In desperation friend james turns to bald face wild speculation:   
      
   >They obviously have data they are using to arrive at that 20 time   
   >figure. Just write to them and ask to see their proof.   
      
   Bingo, friend james confirms that the jw vatican fails the "prove all   
   things"   
   >5/18/   
   Why doesn't he write, because it would be taken as a weakness of absolute   
   faith to suggest the jw vatican is in error.  He would risk being tossed   
   out.  If the jw vatican says it is so, that is the end of the story.   
      
   Believe us or get out, that is jw vatican "prove all things", no?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca