XPost: alt.bible, alt.religion.christian.biblestudy, alt.religion.christianity   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic   
   From: none@none.con   
      
   On Jun 23, 2023, tesla sTinker wrote   
   (in article ):   
      
   >   
   > On 6/23/2023 1:46 PM, No one scribbled:   
   > > On Jun 23, 2023, servant wrote   
   > > (in article<6495d0a4$0$2245$1c4686b2@news.club.cc.cmu.edu>):   
   > >   
   > > > Friend james proposes a theory:>   
   > > >   
   > > > > No one went to a confessional by the first century Christians.   
   > > >   
   > > > Correct, one by one individuals stood before the congregation for public   
   > > > confession/absolution of their sins in the early church.   
   > >   
   > > No proof of that shown.   
   > > >   
   > > > How does the jw vatican prescribe practicing confession/absolution and on   
   > > > what authority?   
   > > >   
   > > > 1 John says all blievers sin and confession of the sin is the cure. He   
   > > > adds if someone says they do not sin; they are a liar.   
   > >   
   > > Confessing is not a cure. That is pretty obvious to everyone.   
   > > >   
   > > >   
   > > > As for who has the authority of absolution scripture declares:   
   > > >   
   > > > In the Gospel of John, Jesus says to the Apostles, after being raised   
   from   
   > > > the dead, "Receive the Holy Spirit. Whose sins you forgive, they are   
   > > > forgiven; and whose sins you shall retain, they are retained".   
   > >   
   > > That verse is also out of character and out of place. since on its face a   
   > > person who was not Born Again could conceivably be forgiven against their   
   > > will, against Gods will, and whether or not the person actually asked for   
   > > it.   
   > > That is not in conformity with any other part of scripture, especially when   
   > > a   
   > > person sins against or blasphemes the Holy Spirit. The only possible other   
   > > explanation would be if a brother sinned agains them, could they forgive,   
   > > similar to Peter asking Jesus about how many times should he forgives   
   > > someone   
   > > who offends them.   
   > >   
   > > Nowhere in the Book of Acts or in the Epistles do we find any instance of   
   an   
   > > apostle remitting the sins of anyone. They do go everywhere, proclaiming   
   the   
   > > forgiveness of sins. Let me ask the question: What is it that forgives   
   sins?   
   > > Even God cannot just arbitrarily forgive sins. Forgiveness of sins is only   
   > > and alone through the blood of Jesus Christ. Back in the Old Testament, the   
   > > forgiveness of sins was based on the fact that Christ would come and die.   
   > > God   
   > > saved “on credit†in the Old Testament until Christ would come   
   and   
   > > pay the penalty. Today God forgives our sins when we believe that Christ   
   > > died   
   > > for them.   
   > >   
   > > Also, there is a lame argument that people such as you use, in that this   
   was   
   > > spoken by the Lord to the Apostles. Your argument would then typically   
   claim   
   > > that it was to them alone and no one else. You all have used that argument   
   > > many times for other similar points.   
   > >   
   > > So which is it?   
   > >   
   > > >   
   > > > In the line of apostolic succession and for the church established by   
   > > > Christ; a priest as the srvant and on behalf of his bishop can excersize   
   > > > that authority.   
   > >   
   > > This was not assigned to a position of leadership. Specific or otherwise.   
   > > There is NO "line of apostolic succession". That is totally unscriptural.   
   No   
   > > priest could ever forgive sins against God, not in the Old Testament, or   
   the   
   > > New.   
   > >   
   > > Mar 2:10 But that ye may know that the Son of man hath power on earth to   
   > > forgivesins, (he saith to the sick of the palsy,)   
   > >   
   > > Jas 5:13 Is any among you afflicted? let him pray. Is any merry? let him   
   > > sing   
   > > psalms.   
   > >   
   > > Jas 5:14 Is any sick among you? let him call for the elders of the church;   
   > > and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord:   
   > >   
   > > Jas 5:15 And the prayer of faith shall save the sick, and the Lord shall   
   > > raise him up; and if he have committed sins, they shall be forgiven him.   
   > >   
   > > Jas 5:16 Confess your faults one to another, and pray one for another, that   
   > > ye may be healed. The effectual fervent prayer of a righteous man availeth   
   > > much.   
   > >   
   > > Notice who it is that forgives here, it is the Lord.   
   > >   
   > > Any man can forgive those that sin against them, "Let it not be held   
   against   
   > > them", we are commanded to forgive those who sin against us.   
   > >   
   > > >   
   > > > That doctrine includes the lutheran and anglican churchs among   
   protestants.   
   > > > Other protestants have a general confession/absolution, ie. it is done by   
   > > > the congregation as a whole in the presence of the pastor.   
   > >   
   > > Then show examples of that, and also show scriptural support for such a   
   > > thing   
   > > as you describe.   
   > wow, your an expert? ha. I think not. It does not include false   
   > churches. Protestant Churches are false Churches. this is why, the true   
   > Bible, declares with the word true or truth, what is His true   
   > Church.   
      
   Ok, you have no scriptural support. So what is you opinion worth?   
   >   
   >   
   > And no, God will not forgive you your sins, unless, you do not do them.   
      
   If you do no sin then no forgiveness is necessary.   
   Jesus forgave our sins 2,000 years ago, on the cross.   
      
   >   
   > And if you sin again, just think, your it for the devil again, until   
   > you stop doing it. Devil gets you as soon as you sin yes. God does not   
   > listen to sinners unless, they confess. And it has nothing to do with   
   > acting. All actors are of falsehood. Especially freemasons.   
   >   
   > The confessional was built for the reason of population. To many nosy   
   > no bodys like you. And it is none of their business what the sin of   
   > another is in the public. And that, is why it was made. And if you   
   > cannot find a true priest, than it is understood, you use Jesus for it.   
   > Explaining to Him, the situation. He is one of the reasons why the   
   > circumstance of the Jews, and their cheating God's precepts, that He came.   
      
   Believers are Kings and priests of the Lord.   
      
   The confessional is not scriptural.   
      
   Any person in whom the Spirit of God does not dwell is None of His. Rom   
   8:9-10   
   >   
   >   
   > If justice runs on God, there is justice. If it runs on the selfishness   
   > of humans, there is no justice. Sins are why.   
   > One either except the entire true Holy Bible, or they cheat it.   
   > It matters not if it is speaking of a liar or not. It is how you   
   > interpret it that matters. There is a correct way, and an incorrect way,   
   > always.   
      
   It is how God interprets in Not man.   
      
   Scripture is NOT of ANY private interpretation.   
      
   “Understanding this first: That no prophecy of scripture is made by private   
   interpretation. For prophecy came not by the will of man at any time: but the   
   holy men of God spoke, inspired by the Holy Ghost.” (2Pe 1:20-21)   
      
   >   
   >   
   > daniel ofm minum   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)