XPost: alt.bible, alt.religion.christian.biblestudy, alt.religion.christianity   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic   
      
   >>Friend james ponders some notions:   
   >>   
   >>>But there is a   
   >>>problem. Not all churches agree on the Christian beliefs. And even   
   >>>within some of their own churches there are disagreements and   
   >>>divisions, etc. Does the Christ exist divided? Not really.   
   >>>   
   >>Hmmm, the jw vatican as a top down "accept our rule on everthing or get   
   >>tosssed out of a chance to eternal life" has a far far greater flaw.  It   
   >>has a long history of doing sudden flip flops on the meaning of scripture   
   >>and thus doctrine and practice.  In 1954 at the "hall" Christ was   
   >>worshiped, the next week the jw vatican said to worship Him is now >   
   >>forbidden.  Did scripture change or did the jw vatican impose yet another   
   flip flop?   
      
   >Don't you upgrade a computer program when they correct certain bugs   
   man made flip flop on what they said it teaches?>found in it?   
   >   
   Sorry friend james, that jw vatican excuse only makes the fatal flaw far   
   far worse.   
      
   The jw vatican claims to be the only pipeline to God, He instructs them   
   directly on understanding scripture is the claim.   
      
   That would mean before 154 God was misleading; even lying to the jw vatican   
   on worship of Christ,, no?  Given the jw vatican history of flip flops that   
   strongly suggests God is even now misleading/lying until the next flip   
   flop; "software revision" comes along, no?   
      
   No, it is clearly a "fix" previous doctrine/practice aftr the fact to   
   provide excuses for error that can no longer be avoided.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)