home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.religion      Nah-uh! My God is better than YOUR God!      192,254 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 190,830 of 192,254   
   No one to servant   
   Re: God's 2nd revelation; is it - Evolut   
   28 Jul 23 20:17:56   
   
   XPost: alt.bible, alt.religion.christian.biblestudy, alt.religion.christianity   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic   
   From: none@none.con   
      
   On Jul 28, 2023, servant wrote   
   (in article<64c452c7$0$2245$1c4686b2@news.club.cc.cmu.edu>):   
      
   >   
   > > > Friend james wants to dismiss God's revelation on the nature and change   
   in   
   > > > life forms these paset 3.5 billion years.   
   > >   
   > > Actually 'James' just wants to go by the Holy Bible, which says that   
   > > God CREATED all the different life forms. Those in the past, and those   
   > > that are around today. God did not evolve them.   
   >   
   > Maybe someday friend james will pay attention to what he reads; behold:   
   > >   
   > > But don't get evolution mixed up with changes within a species.   
   >   
   > Who mentioned biological evolution. The observation directly from God's   
   > 2nd revelation is quite simple, do try to follow. For example; any of the   
   > dino species from some 60 million years ago do not now exist. Any f   
   > today's species did not exist then.   
   >   
   > The species in the past 60 millionn years did not remain constant; but   
   > which ones existed at any time changed. That makes no reference to   
   > biological evolution as explanation; it is only to direct observation at   
   > any time period.   
   >   
   > > For   
   > > example, a dog living in a very warm climate has a thin coat on. But   
   > > move him up to Antarctica and he will grow a thick coat. That is not   
   > > evolution. It is just changes built in the DNA. After this, it is   
   > > still a dog.   
   >   
   > A short answer, nonsense. Did the jw vatican really try to teach you that   
   > or is it just your current guess ? You will find *no* person in the   
   > socalled "young earth creation" groups who will agree with you on that   
   > dog fairy tale. Features of dog coats do not change if moved from alaska   
   > to florida.   
   >   
   > Here is the short version, domestigated dogs have been around for some 15k   
   > years. Each variety/breed emerged to serve a particular function valuable   
   > to those who domesticated them for hunting etc. during that time span.   
   >   
   > Humans chose in each litter to breed those with the desired features for   
   > the function they wanted. That process in all domesticated animals was   
   > exactly the same. Humans continue to choos which animals to breed even   
   > now. Any farm kidd can tell you that.   
   >   
   > Fyi, plants such as grains/lentles etc. now exibit their various   
   > features/functions for the same selective breeding reason. Domesticated   
   > animal/plant varieties originated from their wild forms, some of which   
   > have survived in that form.   
      
   You obviously neglect the elephant in the room, that being 4,000 years ago   
   there was a great global reset.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca