XPost: alt.bible, alt.religion.christian.biblestudy, alt.religion.christianity   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic   
      
   >>Now friend james can resume good sleep.  Here is info about the jw vatican   
   >>group doing the nwt "translation", found on various web sites; the below   
   >>from one of them:   
   >>   
   >>Nathan H. Knorr, Fredrick W. Franz, Albert D. Schroeder, George D. Gangas,   
   >>and Milton G. Henschel as members of the translation team   
   >>   
   >>How do we know, one of the above revealed the truth.   
   >>   
   >>Did any of them have any experience to do biblical greek/hebrew   
   >>translation?   
   >   
   >You conveniently keep leaving out something. There are BIBLE SCHOLARS   
   >who say the NWT is a scholarly translation.   
      
   Friend james wobbles off topic, snipped.  It is mention of some scholars   
   who say the nwt is ok.  Given the many many times the jw vatican has been   
   caught with hhalf truths and/or editing such remarks to make say something   
   it doesn't says, I don't for one second trust the list.   
      
   For example, friend james used to trot out a greek scholar said to agree   
   with jw vatican "fixing" John 1:1, he no longer uses him.  I posted a video   
   of him saying the nwt was trah and his coments had been used falsely, as   
   above.   
      
   >>"The New World Bible translation committee had no known translators with   
   >>recognized degrees in Greek or Hebrew exegesis or translation...   
   >   
   >See above what Bible scholars say about the New World Translation.   
   >   
   See also above why the jw vatican "fixed" info about them is likely self   
   serving trash and lies.   
   >>   
   >>None of these men had any university education except Franz, who left   
   >>school after two years, never completing even an undergraduate degree."   
   >   
   >See above what Bible scholars say about the New World Translation.   
      
   And also why the jw vatican version of their remarks is not to b trusted.   
   >>   
   >>The same person who revealed that also confirmed the above.   
   >>   
   >>The jw vatican wants to keep concealed the above truths.  They say they   
   >>want to deflect any public honoors from them.  No, they want to keep the   
   >>truth hidden from jw members least the lies be known.   
   >   
   Friend james has a short memory:   
      
   >That is absurd. In the age of the Internet, keeping secrets is next to   
   >impossible.   
   Smile, in past discussion of the topic friend james claimed exactly above   
   in a form almost word for word of the jw vatican info.>   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)