Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.religion    |    Nah-uh! My God is better than YOUR God!    |    192,254 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 190,979 of 192,254    |
|    servant to All    |
|    Re: Answered; Should prayers be memorize    |
|    25 Aug 23 16:05:55    |
      XPost: alt.bible, alt.religion.christian.biblestudy, alt.religion.christianity       XPost: alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic              >>Friend james seeks help to understand:       >>       >>>Matthew 6:7 "And when you are praying, do not use meaningless repetition       >>>as the Gentiles do, for they suppose that they will be heard for their       >>>many words.       >>       >>Hmm, given the subject line, should jw memorize and repeat the lord's       >>prayer? It follows the above in averse or so and must be related to the       >>above, no?       >>       >>The "meaningless"; or "vain" in the kjv is the subject and thus an       >>important key in understanding. In my faith tradition the phrase "Lord       >>have mercy" is most often spoken in a set of 3. Is that phrase a       >>"meaningless/vain" petition of God?       >       Friend james condems self:              >To pray by rote is not Biblical.       >       Ah, the answer to the jw vatican using the Lord's prayer, no? The frist       christians continued in the jwish synagogue prayers and practices, they are       recited often in a from each repeated in their worship and prayers. Thus       friend james has condemned the apostles/disciples etc. based on jw vatican       definition 2000 years later , no?.       >>       >>If a jw prays "we ask God" and repeated as "we also ask God"multiple times       >>in a list of petitions; in worship/prayer does the above apply?       >       >It always applies. The prayer might list about the same items most of       >the time, but it is not memorized but is spontaneous.       >>       Smile, sure sure; need it be memorized to be ""repetition"" as above? But       more jw vatican current ideas forced into scripture 2000 years later, no?       >>It appears more likely this is but another example of the jw vatican       >>pouring backward current ideas into words 2000 years ago to fluff up their       >>own image .       >       >Your opinion is noted.       >       Bingo, friend james finds himself left without a rotely memorized jw       vatican plugin to use and left dangleing, no??              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca